Originally written by Bill Dannemeyer (husband of Dr. Lorraine Day)
U.S. Congressman, 1979–1992
Your U.S. government can now legally kill Christians for the “crime” of worshipping Jesus Christ!
A diabolic deception has been perpetrated on the American people by their OWN leaders, Senators, and Congressmen, who have sold their souls to the devil.
On March 5, 1991, in the House of Representatives, and March 7, 1991, in the U.S. Senate, without any knowledge of, or input by, the people of the United States, U.S. Senators, and Congressmen passed a law that is so outrageous — and frankly unconstitutional — that it forces the American people to be bound by a set of monstrous rules, called the Noahide Laws, rules that make the belief in Jesus Christ a crime punishable by decapitation by guillotine!
On March 20, 1991, President George H.W. Bush, a supposed Christian, signed the bill into law. (Deanna’s note: President George W. Bush follows in his father’s footsteps. See A Free Press, A Free Pass)
Before you respond, “NO, that cannot be — not in our free country!” let me explain.
The passage of this law, HJ Res. 104, is especially troublesome to me because I was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives at the time it was passed. Even worse, I was in the House Chamber the very day that it was passed, voting on other legislation. Yet I, as the U.S.
Congressman had NO KNOWLEDGE that it had been passed or even that it was to be brought up for a vote. How could this be? How could the deception be so pervasive that those of us who had sworn to uphold our country’s Constitution, particularly those of us (few, indeed) who really took our position seriously as the protectors of the people, could be totally in the dark regarding the content of this bill and its passage by the leaders of this country — by treachery and deceit?
Here’s how it happened!
On January 31, 1991, an innocuous-sounding Resolution was introduced, designating March 26, 1991, as “Education Day, USA.” It was purposely given this name to deceive the American people. It was, in fact, a Double Deception because not only did the Resolution have nothing to do with “Education,” it was also deceptively billed as a vehicle for recognizing the eighty-ninth birthday of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson. But in truth, the Resolution was nothing less than a secret, under-handed plot to control the American people by the Noahide Laws — a subterfuge for the elimination of Christianity, the elimination of all Christians, and the enslavement of all remaining “Gentiles.”
The Resolution, first introduced by Minority Leader, Rep. Robert H. Michel of Illinois, was then referred to the House Post Office and Civil Service Committee. Early in March 1991, 225 members of the House had signed on as co-sponsors of this Resolution, but it is highly doubtful they were given the full text of the document. They were probably told only that it was a Resolution in honor of Rabbi Schneerson’s birthday. Most likely they had no knowledge that the treacherous Noahide Laws were a silent attachment. I was not one of the co-sponsors.
The committee referred this Resolution to the House for a vote on March 5, 1991. But here is where the real treachery begins!
The record states that the House of Representatives passed this Resolution by “Unanimous Consent.” But what the average American does not know is that “Unanimous Consent” is a euphemism for getting a bill passed “under the radar” with almost NO ONE present to vote AND with NO RECORD of who voted or HOW they voted.
A Congressman’s ears prick up when he hears the words “Unanimous Consent” because he is aware that this may be a signal for skullduggery. And in this case, it most certainly was! On the day this Resolution was “passed,” the entire membership of the House of Representatives had already been dismissed after having been told that the day’s work, including all the voting, was over. We could all go home.
It was THEN, after virtually ALL members had left, that the traitorous authors of this Resolution brought it up for a vote on the House floor — with only four hand-picked members present. It was then deceitfully “passed” by “Unanimous Consent” on March 5, 1991, by voice vote with almost NO ONE there and NO RECORD made of their names or how they voted. Two days later, on March 7, 1991, the U.S. Senate passed the Resolution by voice vote, also with no recorded vote. On March 20, 1991, it was signed by President George H. W. Bush and became Public Law 102–14.
As you read on, you will discover the identity of the evil forces that have so much control over the U.S. Government that they can accomplish these dastardly deeds under cover of darkness.
This is the language of HJ Res. 104: 102nd CONGRESS 1st Session H. J. RES. 104. JOINT RESOLUTION To designate March 26, 1991, as `Education Day, U.S.A.’.
HJ 104 EH. 102nd CONGRESS. 1st Session H. J. RES. 104 JOINT RESOLUTION
To designate March 26, 1991, as `Education Day, U.S.A.’
Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded.
Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws.
Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos.
Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society.
Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these historical ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future.
Whereas the Lubavitch movement has fostered and promoted these ethical values and principles throughout the world.
Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991.
Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader,
the rebbe,’ this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one ofeducation and giving,’ the year in which we turn to education and charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as `Education Day, U.S.A.’. The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such a day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
Passed the House of Representatives on March 5, 1991.
The Lubavitch movement mentioned in HJ Res. 104, began in the late 18th century and is the largest branch of orthodox Hasidic Judaism. One of its prime goals is the enforcement of the Noahide Laws on all humanity.
The words “Seven Noahide Laws” are mentioned twice in this Resolution. But completely missing from this Resolution are the following:
- WHAT IS THE SPECIFIC LANGUAGE OF THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS?
- WHO DRAFTED THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS AND WHERE DID THEY COME FROM?
- WHEN WERE THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS DRAFTED?
- WHO DEFINES WHAT THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS MEAN? WHAT IS THE PENALTY FOR VIOLATING THEM? WHO WILL ADMINISTER THEM?
- “MAN’S” SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS VS. GOD’S TEN COMMANDMENTS.
- TO WHOM DO THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS APPLY AND WHO MAKES THAT DECISION?
- IS HJ RES. 104, CONTAINING THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS CONSTITUTIONAL?
(1) WHAT IS THE SPECIFIC LANGUAGE OF THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS?
The Encyclopedia of Judaism describes The Noachide Laws (the words Noahide and Noachide are used interchangeably) as follows:
The Noahide Laws — The Encyclopedia of Judaism
1. Civil justice [the duty to establish a legal system];
2. Prohibition of blasphemy [which includes the bearing of false witness];
3 The abandonment of idolatry;
4. The prohibition of incest [including adultery and other sexual offenses];
5. The prohibition of murder;
6. Also that of theft;
7. The law against eating flesh [a limb] cut from a living animal [i.e.., cruelty in any shape or form] (Babylonian Talmud. Sanh. 56A)
Before providing answers to the other six questions, I would like to describe my analysis of the process by which this Resolution was adopted by Congress.
When you initially read HJ Res. 104, it seems to be a vehicle for recognizing the eighty-ninth birthday and the beginning of the 90th year of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson which fell on March 26, 1991.
I have no recollection of anyone asking me to co-sponsor this Resolution, so I am not familiar with what reasons were given to House of Representative members to sign on as co-sponsors.
The language of the Resolution speaks for itself. But the consequence of their adoption is that the Seven Noahide Laws have been recognized by the Congress of the United States and the President of America as “the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization” and the claim will be made that they are now the law of our land, the United States.
Most Americans would be shocked to learn that the Babylonian Talmud, NOT the Old Testament, is the “Holiest” book of Judaism, and is the source of these Seven Noahide Laws, which provide a specific penalty for violating any of these Seven Noahide Laws, namely death by decapitation [Sanhedrin 57A]
Make no mistake about it, what appeared to be nothing more than a recognition of the eighty-ninth birthday of Rabbi Schneerson and the establishment of Education Day in the United States will be claimed by the proponents of this Resolution as the establishment of a law by which a Christian who worships Jesus Christ will be charged with idolatry and decapitated.
Based on my fourteen years of service in the House of Representatives, the process by which HJ Res. 104 was adopted was a complete disregard and purposeful circumvention of a very important basis on which representative government is founded. Namely, accountability to the people of America of how we conduct the people’s business.
Specifically, roll call votes are the means whereby members of Congress identify what laws have been passed and by whom. When laws and resolutions pass by unanimous consent, watch out! In this case, someone or some group wanted to hide the real purpose behind a seemingly innocuous birthday recognition of Rabbi Schneerson.
I was not part of the discussion that led to the drafting and presentation of HJ Res. 104, to members of Congress. But based on my knowledge of how Congress works, this describes what most probably took place.
Jews, who by their financial contributions to members of Congress, claim they control what Congress will or will not do. A look at the recent history of U.S. politics confirms this. “He who has the gold — rules!”
Stephen Sizer, the author of the book, Christian Zionism, first published in 2004, states:
“The Unity Coalition for Israel (UCFI) is probably the most recent network of Christian Zionists to be formed in the US, yet it is already the largest and most powerful.
The UCFI was founded by Esther Levens, a Jew, in Kansas in 1994 and now comprises a broad coalition of 200 different and autonomous Jewish and Christian organizations representing 40 million members who are ‘dedicated to a secure Israel’. Their principal strategy is to lobby the US media and political establishment, to challenge what they term ‘disinformation and propaganda and to express ‘the truth about Israel’.
This coalition has a major influence on both the Republican and Democratic parties by providing the bulk of campaign funding to both sides. Aluf Ben, a spokesman for Shimon Peres, was quoted in Ha’aretz, a leading newspaper in Israel, as claiming that sixty percent of all financial help to Democrats came from Jewish sources.’
According to the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, ‘most pro-Israel fund-raisers estimate that at least 60 to 90 percent of Democratic campaign funding comes from Jewish sources, which also supply perhaps 40 percent of Republican funding’.
Christian Zionists have also been influential in forging a closer relationship with Israel by facilitating solidarity pilgrimages and educational tours to the Holy Land.” (Page 215)
Jewish lobbyists were successful in enlisting Minority Leader, Congressman Bob Michael, to be the chief sponsor of this resolution purportedly to honor and recognize Rabbi Schneerson, the leader of the Lubavitch movement, on his eighty-ninth birthday.
These lobbyists wanted to eliminate, for obvious reasons, any chance for discussion of the seven questions written above in this report. Specifically, the Bible, with particular reference in this instance to the Ten Commandments written by God, is the source of the ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society, not the Seven Noahide Laws, written by a man.
To avoid this debate and the recorded vote that would have followed, a strategy was devised to get Resolution 104 adopted by “unanimous consent” with no documentation that 99% of all House members were absent, and none of the four members that were present would be held accountable by a recorded vote.
The Journal of the House of Representatives (JHR) for March 5, 1991, on page 151, describes item 30.12 H Res. 95- Unfinished Business. This Resolution commended the President and the United States and allied military forces in the success of Operation Desert Storm. A recorded vote was taken, and Item 30.13 describes the count: Yeas 410, Nays 8. My yes vote was among the 410. This page contains the name of each member present and how he or she voted.
Item 30.14, on the next page (page 152) of the JHR, recorded the announcement that when the House adjourns, it will meet on Wednesday, March 6, at 12 noon. This told all the members that there would be no more roll call votes on Tuesday, March 5, that the day’s business was over, and within minutes after this announcement, virtually all the members were off the House floor, on their way home, and totally unaware of anything thereafter that was brought up.
Here is the subsequent record of what took place AFTER the members were gone. Item 30.15 of the JHR was a routine announcement concerning recesses and a joint session with the President of the United States:
But then after almost everyone was gone for the day, Item 30.16 on the agenda, HJ Res. 104, the Resolution in question, was surreptitiously brought up on the House floor with only four members present, who spoke on behalf of the Resolution. This is how it occurred:
Congressman Thomas Sawyer (D-OH), the Chairman of the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service asked for “unanimous consent” to take up HJ Res. 104. Congressman Thomas Ridge (R-PA) reserved the right to object but did not object.
If he had objected, it would have stopped the process of unanimous consent. Instead, he acknowledged the work of Minority Leader Michel who was the chief sponsor of this legislation and he then yielded to (Jewish) Congressman Benjamin Gilman (R-NY). Congressman Gilman spoke briefly as did Minority Leader Michel. It appears likely that these four Congressmen were the only ones present.
After assisting with the underhanded passage of HJ Res. 104, Congressman Thomas Ridge also subsequently assisted in the cover-up of the truth of 9/11, claiming that flight #93 crashed in Pennsylvania, even though NO parts of an airplane or passengers or baggage were ever found. From then on Thomas Ridge’s career blossomed!
At the time of 9/11, Ridge was Governor of Pennsylvania (1995–2001). But in 2003, Ridge was named the First Secretary of the new Department of Homeland Security (2003–2005).
After the tragic multiple shootings at Virginia Tech on April 16, 2007, Ridge became part of the committee to cover up what actually happened in that event.
Continuing with the debacle of the “Noahide Laws” passage, the Speaker pro tempore asked if there was any objection to the request from Congressman Sawyer. There was no objection.
30.16 EDUCATION DAY, U.S.A.
On motion of Mr. Sawyer, by unanimous consent, the Committee on Post Office and Civil service was discharged from further consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 104) to designate March 26, 1991, as “Education Day, U.S. A.”
When said joint resolution was considered, read twice, ordered to be engrossed and read a third time, was read a third time by title, and passed.
A motion to reconsider the vote whereby said joint resolution was passed was, by unanimous consent, laid on the table.
Ordered, That the Clerk request the concurrence of the Senate in said joint resolution.
Their total remarks consumed no more than four or five minutes and there was not even a mention of the Seven Noahide Laws. For the balance of the early evening, these routine non-controversial items were considered by the “House” with only these four members present.
Item 30.17 National Employ the Older Worker Week
Item 30.18 Baltic Foreeda day
Item 30.19 Leave of Absence
Item 30.20 Adjournment
The Jews claim that with their financial contributions they have bought control of the U.S. Congress, and so they have. As proof of this statement no one needs to search further than the blunt words of Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, uttered on October 3, 2001, to his colleague, Shimon Peres:
“Every time we do something, you tell me America will do this and will do that…I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”
Indeed, the Jews had “bought” control of the House and Senate which resulted in ignoring the whole concept of accountability that the presence of debate and a roll call vote accomplishes. Bringing up HJ Res. 104 for passage at a time when the process selected assured that no more than four members of the House of Representatives were present, each of whom was committed to the passage of HJ Res. 104, guaranteed that when the request for unanimous consent was expressed on the floor of the House, no one was around to object. And because no one objected, the passage was obtained with no member having his or her vote recorded in favor of or against the Resolution.
By design, there was no roll call vote and thus no member was held accountable for what Congress did. This is a prime example of the fraud perpetrated on the American people by their so-called “Representatives.” The oft-quoted cliché is operating here, “With friends like these, who needs enemies?”
(2) WHO DRAFTED THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS AND WHERE DID THEY COME FROM?
Dr. Eliezer Segal, a Jewish Associate Professor of Theology at the University of Calgary, admits that history proves that the Talmud, Mishnah (a part of the Talmud), and the seven Noahide Laws are derived from Babylonian traditions, that Jesus vehemently denounced because they nullified the teaching of Scripture.
The Encyclopedia of Judaism identifies the Babylonian Talmud (T.B.) as the source of the Noahide Laws.
According to “Secret Societies and Subversive Movements,” by Nesta Webster, the Talmud, and the Kabbalah, were derived from Jewish oral Traditions which the Jews claim to have the same authority as the Laws of Moses found in Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy.
The “Holiest” books of Judaism are the Talmud, a compendium of over 100 “books” written by Pharisees and Jewish Rabbis, which is the utter perversion of God’s Word.
The Kabbalah, another Jewish “holy book,” is a book of witchcraft and licentious debauchery.
Provisions of the Talmud, Genesis Rabbah 16: 6. Sanhedrin 56 states that the seven Noahide Laws were commanded to Adam. Yet there is nothing in the Bible to support this claim.
The book, Judaism’s Strange Gods, by Michael A. Hoffman (2000), describes how the Talmud specifically defines all non-Jews as non-human animals. It also distinguishes between actions by Jews against non-Jews, from actions of non-Jews against Jews. Jews are clearly spoken of as Superior to non-Jews.
Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God
Sanhedrin 58b. If a gentile hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed.
Acceptable to Cheat Non-Jews
Sanhedrin 57a. A Jew need not pay a gentile the wages owed him.
Jews Have Superior Legal Status
Baba Kamma 37b. “If an ox of Israelite gore an ox of a Canaanite (Gentile) there is no liability, but if an ox of Canaanite gore an ox of an Israelite…the payment is to be in full.”
Jews May Steal from Non-Jews.
Baba Mezia 24a. If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile, it does not have to be returned. (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b.) Sanhedrin 76a. God will not spare a Jew who marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a gentile…”
Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews.
Sanhedrin 57a. When a Jew murders a gentile there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a Gentile he may keep.
Baba Kamma 37b. The gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has “exposed their money to Israel.”
“Relying upon the Code of Maimonides and the Halacha, the Gush Emunim leader Rabbi Israel Ariel stated: “A Jew who killed a non-Jew is exempt from human judgment and has not violated the religious prohibition of murder.”
Jews May Lie to Non-Jews
Baba Kamma 113a. Jews may use lies (“subterfuges”) to circumvent a Gentile.
Non-Jewish Children are Sub-Human
Yebamoth 98a. All gentile children are animals. Abodah Zarah 36b. Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.
Insults Against Mary
Sanhedrin 106a. says Jesus’ mother was a whore: “She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters.” Also, in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b of the Soncino edition, it is stated that in the “uncensored” text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus’ mother, “Miriam the hairdresser,” had sex with many men.
Jesus is also described in the Talmud
By 1999, certain Orthodox Jewish organizations described Jesus as a sorcerer and a demented sex freak.
On the website of the Orthodox Jewish, Chabad-Lubavitch group, chabad.org, — one of the largest and most powerful Jewish organizations in the world and whose spiritual leader, Rabbi Menachen Mendel Schneerson, whose birthday honoring was the false flag cover-up for signing into law the authority to murder Christians for worshiping Jesus Christ — we find the following statement, accompanied by citations from the Talmud:
“The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of ‘Jesus the Nazarene.’
- ‘He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a).’”
- “He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a).”
- “He learned witchcraft in Egypt…(Shabbos 104b).” (End quote from Chabad-Lubavitch).
More quotes from the Talmud about Jesus
Gitten 57a says Jesus is in hell, being boiled in “hot excrement.”
Sanhedrin 43 says Jesus was executed because he practiced sorcery: “It is taught that on the eve of Passover Jesus was hung, and forty days before this the proclamation was made: Jesus is to be stoned to death because he has practiced sorcery and has lured the people to idolatry…He was an enticer and of such thou shalt not pity or condone.”
Genocide Advocated by the Talmud
Soferim 15, Rule 10. This is the saying of Rabbi Simon ben Yohai” Tob shebe goyim harog (“Even the best of the gentiles should all be killed”).
This Talmudic passage has been concealed in some translations.
The Jewish Encyclopedia states, “…in the various versions the reading has been altered, ‘The best among the Egyptians’ being generally substituted.” In the Soncino version: “the best of the heathens” (Monor Tractates, Soferim 41a-b). But “heathen” is translated as “Gentile” (non-Jews) by the Jews.
Talmudic Doctrine: Non-Jews are not Human
The Talmud specifically defines all who are not Jews as non-human animals and specifically dehumanizes Gentiles as not being descendants of Adam.
Moses Maimonides: Advocate of Extermination
The rabbinic teacher Moses Maimonides called the “Rambam” by the Jews, is revered in Judaism as a supreme “sage” of the highest stature.
“Moses Maimonides is considered the greatest codifier and philosopher in Jewish history. He is often affectionately referred to as the Rambam, after the initials of his name and title, Rabenu Moshe Ben Maimon, “our Rabbi, Moses’ son of Maimon.”
According to the introduction to the book, Maimonides’ Principles, p. 5, Maimonides “spent twelve years extracting every decision and law from the Talmud and arranging them all into 14 systematic volumes. The work was finally completed in 1180, and was called Mishnah Torah, or “Code of the Torah.”
Here is what Maimonides taught concerning the saving of the life of a Gentile or Christian and even Jews who dared to deny the “divine inspiration” of the Talmud:
“Accordingly, if we see an idolater (gentile) being swept away or drowning in the river, we should not help him.”
Maimonides ruled that it is a Jewish court — or a court-appointed by Jewish authority — that enforces obedience and passes judgment on Gentiles, as well as promulgating legislation by court order for that purpose. Maimonides further decreed that any non-Jewish nation “not subject to our jurisdiction” (tahaht yadeinu) will be the target of Jewish holy war.
These courts are to be convened allegedly under the “Noahide Laws” (proscriptions against idolatry supposedly based on the covenant with Noah). But there is nothing in the Bible to support this claim. This claim is a preposterous FRAUD — and a sign of the anti-Christ!
Prof. Easterly of the Southern University Law Center, a Jewish legal expert, has diabolically compared HJ Res. 104 to the “first rays of dawn” which “evidence the rising of a still unseen sun.”
The Jewish Encyclopedia envisages a Noahide regime as a possible world order (One World Government) immediately preceding the “universal reign of the Talmud.” A terrifying prospect, indeed!
These provisions of the Talmud, the same Talmud that is the source of the Noahide laws, make very clear why the proponents of HJ Res. 104 used the subterfuge of obtaining the passage of this legislation without any debate or a recorded vote. HJ Res. 104 was fraudulently and deceitfully passed by “unanimous consent” when no one was around to consider and discuss the provisions of the Talmud. If these had been brought to the attention of the members of Congress, HJ Res. 104 would never have been passed.
The Chabad Lubavitch falsely claims that God gave the Seven Noahide Laws at Mt. Sinai with the intention that the Children of Israel should keep them and teach them to the Gentiles. This is a deliberate lie!
There is absolutely no support in the Bible for this fraudulent claim.
The Source of these Seven Noahide Laws was NOT, as the Jews have claimed, directions from God to Adam — or Noah — or Moses. Their source is the Oral Traditions of the Pharisees that began in Babylon after the Israelites were captured in 586 BC.
Over 600 years later, after the Pharisees had killed Christ and the Temple in Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD, these Oral Traditions were written down and became the Babylonian Talmud.
(3) WHEN WERE THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS DRAFTED?
The Exodus of the Israelites from Egypt took place in about 1445 BC. Moses died in 1405 BC. Shortly after beginning the forty-year wandering in the desert, God wrote the Ten Commandments on two tablets with his own finger, and they are recorded in Exodus 20: 1–17.
The ancient nation of Israel reached its height of power and prestige during the reign of Solomon from 960–930 BC.
After Solomon, most of the Israelite kings were corrupt or inept and the Northern ten tribes of Israel were taken captive by Assyria in 721 BC. The Southern tribes, Judah, and Benjamin were expelled to Babylon in about 586 BC, after which the Talmud oral traditions, specifically including the Seven Noahide Laws, were produced in Babylon during this period.
(4) WHO DEFINES WHAT THE NOAHIDE LAWS MEAN? WHAT IS THE PENALTY FOR VIOLATING THEM? WHO WILL ADMINISTER THEM?
A Jewish website, http://www.noahidenations.com/ states that the worship of any deity other than God, which includes Jesus Christ, is idolatry. The penalty for idolatry is decapitation.
Moses Maimonides (Rabbi Moshe Ben Maimon 1138–1204) is recognized for his preeminence as a Jewish philosopher. Maimonides’ Mishnah Torah, Chapter 10 of the English translation, states concerning Jesus Christ:
“It is a mitzvah (religious command or duty), however, to eradicate Jewish traitors, minim (Gentiles = non-Jews), and apikorsim (secular Jews), and to cause them to descend to the pit of destruction, since they cause difficulty to the Jews and sway the people away from God, as did Jesus of Nazareth and his students, and Tzadok, Baithos, and their students. May the name of the wicked rot.” Sanh.57A of the Talmud states the penalty for disobedience, with these words:
“One additional element of greater severity is that violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noahide to capital punishment by decapitation.”
The Noahide Laws will be administered by a restored Sanhedrin, the ruling body of Jews that found Jesus Christ guilty of blasphemy on the accusations of two false witnesses according to Matthew 26:60. Under the “Courts of Law” section of the
Noahide Laws this is stated:
“A person may be convicted in a Noahide court on the testimony of a single witness, but only if the witness is known to be righteous.”
(5) “MAN’S” SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS VS. GOD’S TEN COMMANDMENTS.
It is God’s Law, the Ten Commandments, that is the basis of civilization, NOT the Noahide Laws written by the killers of Christ — the Pharisees.
The Ten Commandments are found in Exodus 20: 1–17 and were written by God in His own finger on two tablets of stone, to show their permanence. God wrote these Commandments shortly after the Exodus that began in 1445 BC.
Although false claims have been made by the Jews that the origin of the Noahide Laws began with Adam, and included Noah and Moses, Jewish Professor Segal stated that the evidence of history proves that the origin of the Seven Noahide Laws is the Babylonian Traditions!
The captivity and removal to Babylon of the Northern tribes Judah and Benjamin occurred in 586 BC.
In other words, at least 859 years after God gave the Ten Commandments to mankind on Mt. Sinai, the Pharisees, the cultural progeny of the killers of Christ, in exile in Babylon, drafted the Seven Noahide Laws which were written by “man,” NOT by GOD!
In examining the history of the Seven Noahide Laws, no claim is made that God wrote them and/or that He wrote them with His own finger, as He did the Ten Commandments.
TEN COMMANDMENTS IN THE ARK OF COVENANT
The two tablets of stone containing the Ten Commandments written by God were housed inside the Ark of the Covenant. (2 Chronicles 5:10, 1 Kings 8:9) The ordinances, written by Moses, were housed in a side pocket on the outside of the Ark of the Covenant. (Deuteronomy 31:26)
When Jesus died on the cross, He abolished the ordinances written by Moses (housed on the outside of the Ark of the Covenant) including the sanctuary-related ordinances that looked forward to the sacrificial lamb, Jesus Christ, and thus were abolished when these were fulfilled with the crucifixion of Christ. But the ordinances did NOT include the Ten Commandments. The ordinances were totally separate from the Ten Commandments.
No trace of a claim by anyone has been found which asserts that the Seven Noahide Laws were inside or on the outside of the Ark of the Covenant or anywhere during the Israelites sojourn in the wilderness. This fact is not surprising since the Seven Noahide Laws were first developed as a part of the Babylonian Talmud long after the exile of the Israelites to Babylon in 586 BC.
Exodus 20:3–17, contains the Ten Commandments:
3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
6 And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.
7 Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
9 Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work:
10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:
11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
12 Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.
13 Thou shalt not kill.
14 Thou shalt not commit adultery.
15 Thou shalt not steal.
16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.
17 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor anything that is thy neighbor’s.
What God gave in these texts to the Children of Israel was clearly conditional. In the 23rd chapter of Matthew, Jesus properly brought to account the Scribes and Pharisees for not keeping the covenant, the Ten Commandments. No better proof of the total rejection of the covenant was the actions of the Jews to call for the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
The only reason the Pharisaical leaders of the Jews did not directly order Jesus’ death, was that they did not have the legal authority to do so. They were under Roman rule and only a Roman ruler could order the death penalty for any person. So, they pressured Pilate (who said “I find NO FAULT in this “man” (Jesus)) to order the Jews’ murderous demand.
Many Christian leaders claim that the Ten Commandments were done away with at the Cross and only those commandments that Christ specifically mentioned in the New Testament are to be kept by “New Testament Christians.”
This is their justification for ignoring the Fourth Commandment which is God’s command that we keep holy the Sabbath day (Saturday) as the Sabbath. But in the following analysis, you will see that ALL Ten Commandments including the (Saturday) Sabbath Commandment are given in the New Testament.
In addition, Jesus Himself kept the Seventh Day Sabbath, and Jesus was NOT a Jew. Jesus is God and God is not Jewish.
The Christian Patriot Association of Boring, Oregon, published this document, “The Law of God” which contains a side-by-side scriptural reference of the Old and New Testament concerning the Ten Commandments.
THE LAW OF GOD OLD TESTAMENT
- Thou shalt have no other gods before Me.
- Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate Me; and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love Me, and keep my commandments.
- Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord they God in vain, for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh His name in vain.
- Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. Six days shalt thou labor, and do all thy work; but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God, in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates; for in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day; wherefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day, and hallowed it.
- Honor thy father and thy mother; that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.
- Thou shalt not kill.
- Thou shalt not commit adultery.
- Thou shalt not steal
- Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.
- Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor anything that is thy neighbor’s.
See Exodus 20:1–18
I will not alter nor break the thing that is gone out of my lips.
(See Psalms 89:34) NEW TESTAMENT
- “Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve.” Matthew 4:10
- “Little children keep yourselves from idols.” “Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man’s device.” 1 John 5:21; Acts 17:29
- “That the name of God and His doctrine be not blasphemed.” 1 Timothy 6:1
- “Pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the Sabbath day.” “The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath, therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the Sabbath.” “For He spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise. And God did rest the seventh day from all His works.” “There remaineth therefore a keeping of a Sabbath to the people of God. For he that is entered into His rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from His.” “For by Him were all things created that are in heaven, and that are in earth.” Matthew 24:20, Mark 2:27;28; Hebrews 4:4, 9, 10, margin; Colossians 1:16.
- “Honor thy father and thy mother.” Matthew 19:19.
- “Thou shalt not kill.” Romans 13:9.
- “Thou shalt not commit adultery.” Matthew 19:18.
- “Thou shalt not steal.” Romans 13:9.
- “Thou shalt not bear false witness.” Romans 13:9.
- “Thou shalt not covet.” Romans 7:7.
AFTER HIS DEATH
“Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.” Romans 3.31.
“They… rested the Sabbath day according to the commandment.” Luke 23:54–56
SABBATH IN THE NEW EARTH
“For as the new heavens and the new earth, which I will make, shall remain before Me, saith the Lord, so shall your seed and your name remain, and it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one Sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before Me, saith the Lord.” Isaiah 66:22,23. See Mark 2:27–28.
FOR ADDITIONAL COPIES, COMPLETE CATALOG, OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, CONTACT
CHRISTIAN PATRIOT ASSOCIATION
P.O. Box 596 Boring, OR 97009 (503)668–4941
The words of Jesus in Matthew 5:17–19 completely disprove the idea that His death on the cross repealed the Ten Commandments:
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Anyone who breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do the same will be called least in the kingdom of heaven” (NIV)
When Jesus used the word “fulfill” He meant to convey the idea that His life was a living example of the Ten Commandments. To reach the conclusion that His death on the cross repealed the Ten Commandments would necessitate changing the verb “fulfill” to “abolish” in total conflict with the negative expressly stated by Jesus in the use of this verb. Jesus said, “I have not come to abolish them (the Ten Commandments).”
In Matthew 19:18–19, Jesus mentions Commandments 5–10. These six Commandments reveal how man is to relate to his fellow man.
In Mark 2:27–28, Jesus uses these words to make clear that He not only recognizes and affirms the Fourth Commandment, but He has complete authority over it:
27 The Sabbath was made for man (all mankind, Anthropos in Greek — the root word for anthropology — the study of humanity), and not man for the Sabbath.
28 Therefore, the Son of Man is also Lord of the Sabbath. (This is the Seventh-day (Saturday) Sabbath.)
In Matthew 4:10 Jesus affirms the First Commandment with these words:
Thou shall worship the Lord thy God and Him only shalt thou serve.
The Apostles John, Mark, and Paul made specific references to the Second and Third Commandments in 1 John 5:21; Acts 17:29 and 1 Timothy 6:1.
Archeologists have searched for many centuries in the Christian era to find the Ark of the Covenant. Yet no one has claimed to have found it. In Revelation 11:19, John’s vision revealed that the ark of His covenant was still in the heavenly temple of God.
Here are John’s words:
Then the temple of God was opened in heaven, and the Ark of His covenant was seen in His temple. And there were lightings, noises, thundering’s, and earthquakes and great hail.
The Ark of the Covenant had/has only one item in it — the Ten Commandments. God is telling us through John, the Revelator, that the Ten Commandments are still operative now and will never be abolished. The reason heaven will be heaven is that the Ten Commandments will be in the heart of everyone there.
(6) TO WHO DO THE NOAHIDE LAWS APPLY AND WHO MAKES THAT DECISION?
Proponents of the Noahide Laws claim that the Ten Commandments were given exclusively to the Nation of Israel who they incorrectly refer to as “Jews” — -and the Noahide Laws were given to govern all other persons, — “non-Jews” — or goyim –Gentiles.
Scriptural texts that are quoted to support this false view are Exodus 19:3–6 and 20:1–2 and 3:17. But even a cursory examination of these texts will prove this claim to be utter nonsense.
3. And Moses went up unto God, and the LORD called unto him out of the mountain, saying, thus shalt thou say to the house of Jacob, and tell the children of Israel
4. Ye have seen what I did unto the Egyptians, and how I bare you on eagles’ wings and brought you unto myself.
5. Now, therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth is mine:
6. And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel. The children of Israel were then — and are now — of no particular ethnicity. The term “children of Israel” refers to the TRUE followers of Jesus Christ.
- And God spake all these words, saying,
- I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
Egypt, in the Bible, is symbolic of sin. See Rev. 11:8.
- And I have said, I will bring you up out of the affliction of Egypt unto the land of the Canaanites, and the Hittites, and the Amorites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, unto a land flowing with milk and honey.
There is no language in any of these texts of Scripture, or for that matter, any other text of Scripture in the entire Bible, to support the claim that the Noahide Laws were given to govern all non-Jews and the Ten Commandments were given only to the Jews.
The assertion that the Ten Commandments were given only to the Israelites of old (and supposedly the Jews of today) is CONTRARY to the Word of God and completely ignores the TRUTH of the New Testament. Jesus made this clear in Matthew 5:17:
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.
Jesus “fulfilled” the law by showing us how we must keep the law.
Paul in Galatians 3:16, 29 made the same point:
- Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, and to seeds, as of many; but as of one, and to thy seed, which is Christ.
- And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.
The true followers of Jesus Christ, wherever they may be found, are the “seed of Abraham and heirs according to the promise.”
(7) IS HJ RES. 104, CONTAINING THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS CONSTITUTIONAL?
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides among other things, that:
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”
HJ Res. 104 fraudulently claims that the Seven Noahide Laws are the “bedrock of society” from the dawn of civilization. This is a deliberate lie and seeks to re-write history. The Seven Noahide Laws were written by Jewish Pharisees and Rabbis about 586 BC when the tribes of Judah and Benjamin were in exile in Babylon.
The Ten Commandments were written by God in His own finger in stone approximately 1445 BC at Mt. Sinai.
The Ten Commandments were written by God over 850 years BEFORE the Seven Noahide Laws were written by a man. The Ten Commandments, NOT the fraudulent Noahide Laws, are the generally acknowledged bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization but have not been designated as law by an act of Congress.
Because the Seven Noahide Laws are obviously religious in their purpose, any act of Congress that attempts to establish them as the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization are clearly religious and in a complete and total violation of the First Amendment.
The Noahide Laws have nothing to do with Noah, or Adam or God. In about 1600 B.C. God directed Noah to build an ark and save his family and the animal population of the world from the flood which destroyed life on the surface of the earth.
Over one thousand years later, in 586 BC, during the Babylonian captivity, diabolical laws were developed by the Pharisees and Jewish Rabbis who sought to title these laws with a name that would give them legitimacy.
The purpose of the Jews in developing the Noahide Laws is to rule over all of the non-Jews in the world without having to suffer a mass conversion of these people to Judaism which they fear would dilute the cultural cohesion of the Jewish population.
The Rabbis who produced the Talmud and the Noahide Laws claim that the Noahide Laws are the universal way of reaching God even though they privately state the Noahide Laws are only for the “Gentiles.” Behind this false claim is the true belief of the Rabbis that it is the means whereby the Rabbis are seen as God and are to be worshiped as God by the “Gentiles.”
The Noahide Laws are to become the national, though undeclared, the religion of America. The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits Congress from passing a law that establishes a religion for the United States of America. If another 9–11 type “terrorist” incident takes place, and Martial Law is declared, it is likely that the claim would be made that since the Noahide Laws have been recognized by Congress as the “basis of our civilization” and that according to the third Noahide Law, anyone who worships Jesus Christ violates this law, he or she may be characterized as a terrorist. Then the Talmudic penalty for violating any of the Noahide Laws, namely decapitation, would be enforced.
No American should underestimate the ferocity of the commitment of the Zionist Jews to control the entire political system of the world through the One World Government now being created, and in so doing administer “Justice” as they define it.
The main goal of the Zionist Jews and their New World Order is exactly the same as it was when Jesus was on earth — to exterminate Christ — and His followers! Nothing has changed.