Don’t be a Mask-Hole!

No comments

I’m certain that at some point in your life you made a decision that caused someone to ask you this question. “If all your friends jumped off a bridge, would you?”

My mom, and most likely every mom ever, used to say this to me when I was young. She wasn’t specifically worried about me jumping off a bridge. After all I was kid, and we didn’t live close to any bridges. Instead, she was using an extreme example to make a point about peer pressure. Just because everyone else does something, doesn’t mean you should. She was right, but peer pressure is more complicated than that.

It would be easy if all you had to do was tell random groups of people, “No thanks, I’m not going to jump off a bridge today.” It’s usually not that direct. It’s far more subtle, often with dreadful consequences.

That was then, and this is now . . . Today if a person even questions the Big Pharma – Authoritative Tech narrative that is being pushed by mainstream propaganda that person can be fined and/or even jailed in some cases. Even if that information would actually help not harm people.

I made a video and put on three sites just in case it gets banned. It is based on this blog and it is about an hour long. The video goes into detail answering the questions . . . What and Why do we comply?

Show notes and links for further research:

The authoritarian measures have now grown to include the following:
• checkpoints (asking about travel, checking temperatures)
• temperature screenings at some airports
• contact tracing apps cataloging all your movements and contacts
• emergency orders/executive orders supporting forced vaccinations, isolation, and quarantine
• involuntary quarantine centers/camps
• thermal drones watching people from the sky
• talk of mandatory vaccines (or making it difficult to live without vaccination)
• face recognition tech to fight covid19 (by tracking people violating lockdowns)
• discussion of immunity passports/digital certificates to travel
• censorship of alternative viewpoints
• raiding of businesses for not closing
• arrests of people violating lockdown (and this, and this)
• ankle monitors for those violating quarantine orders
• roving cops searching for people not in the ‘proper’ places

It’s in our nature to compare ourselves to those around us. We want validation, acceptance, respect.

But how can we do this if we are not allowed to ask WHY?

If the masks work . . . Why the six feet?
• CDC Begins Recommending Wearing Two Masks
• Are we finished listening to these assholes yet?

If the six feet works . . . Why the masks?
• The Danish randomized controlled trial on the real-world efficacy of face masks against coronavirus infection – just published their results from their study in the Annals of Internal Medicine. As expected, the trial found no statistically significant benefit of wearing a face mask.

If both of the above work . . . Why the lockdowns?
• Lockdowns Do Not Control the Coronavirus: The Evidence

• Lockdowns Have Depleted Capital in All Forms

If all three of the above work . . . Why the vaccine?
• No truthful person would call this experimental vaccine “safe and effective.” The vaccine requires two doses: one to prime the body; a few weeks later, another one to boost the response. It normally takes 5-15 years to develop a vaccine because years are needed to realize the long-term effects.

• The Covid-19 vaccine is completely experimental. Worse, it comes after 20 years of 100 percent failure in the effort to create a coronavirus vaccine. It is important to understand Moderna is a biotech company that bases drug and vaccine development exclusively on Messenger RNA. They insert a synthetic mRNA into human cells to reprogram them. Pfizer, though a pharmaceutical company, has partnered with a biotech company to produce this vaccine.

Imagine if the Covid vaccine actually contributed to the spread of the infection rather than stopping it? Can you imagine what a catastrophe that would be?
• Unfortunately, there are signs that is precisely what is happening in the countries that have implemented the most aggressive vaccination programs.

• Goal posts moved again: Biden’s COVID-19 team thinks U.S. may not achieve ‘herd immunity’ by Thanksgiving — or even later

Herd immunity may never be achieved because high vaccination rates encourage the evolution of more severe disease-causing organisms

• In theory, if enough people are vaccinated, herd immunity will be achieved, and chains of infection will be disrupted. In reality, a true herd immunity threshold may never be reached within normal heterogenous populations.
• If a true herd immunity threshold level is achieved, it will create a strong selective pressure that encourages the emergence of mutant viral strains.

If the vaccine is safe . . . Why protect it with a no liability clause?
• Vaccine manufacturers already had protection for the health damage that vaccines cause as a function of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. But even more than that, the PREP Act (Public Health and Readiness Act) was passed in the spring of 2020, in the midst of the hysteria of a novel virus. What the PREP Act did is codify into law that COVID vaccine manufacturers would be exempt from liability even if their vaccine harms patients. So, we now have a situation where a drug company can rush an unproven, inadequately tested vaccine and bear no accountability or legal responsibility for that vaccine at all. That is terribly frightening.

• If you have a reaction or die after receiving the “Experimental Gene Therapy Shot” Oh well, you are shit out of luck. Nothing for you or your family. Why risk it? Ivermectin, Doxycycline, and Zinc are 100% effective and very inexpensive.

If the vaccine is safe . . . Why not test it on animals first before using it on humans?

Earlier testing was done on animals with horrifying results.

How COVID-19 Vaccine Can Destroy Your Immune System

Lots of documents for further research.

If SARS-CoV-2 exists . . . Why has it never been isolated?

Coronavirus Disease- CoVid: A virus cannot be a disease; A virus can only cause a disease.

• It is important to understand the difference between CoVid-19 (the disease) and SARS Coronavirus (the virus).

• Too many people are confusing the two. All of us have many viruses in our system. It is important to understand just because you have a virus it does not mean you will get sick, however; if your body cannot fight off the virus, you may get a disease caused by the virus. The virus causes the disease. The disease does not cause the virus. If you have no virus. You have no disease. I hope this helps to clear up the confusion that I believe is being perpetrated on purpose.


Does the Flu Shot Increase COVID-19 Risk? (YES!)

Who normally gets a flu shot? The elderly and the immune compromised.
Colorado Naturopathic Doctor, Michael Murray writes: “Could a new flu vaccine be partly responsible for the COVID-19 mortality rate in Italy? My colleague, Dr. Alex Vazquez, provided me with a valuable insight. In September 2019, Italy rolled out an entirely new type of influenza vaccine.

• This vaccine called VIQCC is different than others. Most available influenza vaccines are produced in embryonated chicken eggs. VIQCC, however, is produced from cultured animal cells rather than eggs and has more of a ‘boost’ to the immune system as a result.

• VIQCC also contains four types of viruses – 2 type A viruses (H1N1 and H3N2) and 2 type B viruses…”

Could this new strain of SARS-Coronavirus really just be a new strain of the flu caused by these new combinations?

First cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine approved for use in Europe This news release is intended for Health Professional media only. 14 Jan 2019
• Seqirus to launch its cell-based influenza vaccine in Europe for the 2019-20 season
• Real-world data indicates cell-based influenza vaccines may be more effective than standard options in seasons affected by egg-adaptation

Was it a coincidence that the outbreak seemed to happen right after these new type of influenza vaccines started being distributed worldwide?
Does the flu shot increase the risk for coronavirus infection? YES!
Could a new flu vaccine be partly responsible for the COVID-19 mortality rate in Italy? YES!
Is the rush to a vaccine the best solution? No, it could bring catastrophic results.
How does the SARS-CoV-2 infect and are protease enzyme supplements the key to creating our own endogenous antiviral protease inhibitors? Yes, I believe so!
Are there certain medications like blood pressure drugs and proton pump inhibitors that increase risk for infection and mortality? YES
Is it chloroquine or is it zinc that is working as a possible aid in treating COVID-19? A strong case can be made for zinc!
Can plant polyphenols and flavonoids act to increase the antiviral effects of zinc? YES! And they possess other benefits too!

Focus on the fourth column

The column to focus on is the fourth column marked “OR”. Coronavirus is 1.36 meaning 36% higher risk – link attached to the full study for those with more inquiring minds.

• It looks like this “super” vaccine (VIQCC also contains four types of viruses – 2 type A viruses (H1N1 and H3N2) and 2 type B viruses) may have impacted the immune system in such a way as to increase coronavirus infection through virus interference.

So, can we trust advice given by International Health/Medical Institutions?

Flu vaccine stockpile to double in China for 2019
• The supply of flu vaccines in China this year will be twice as large as last year to ensure demand is met, the top health authority said on Wednesday, adding it is well prepared for the arrival of flu season.

How Influenza (Flu) Vaccines Are Made – 2019-2020

For the United States there are three different influenza vaccine production technologies approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)external icon:
• egg-based flu vaccine,
• cell-based flu vaccine, and
• recombinant flu vaccine.
All commercially available flu vaccines in the United States are made by private sector manufacturers. Different manufacturers use different production technologies, but all flu vaccines meet FDA safety and effectiveness requirements. Different vaccines have different indications. See Influenza Vaccines — United States, 2019-2020 Influenza Season for specific indications.

What is a cell-based flu vaccine?
• ‘Cell-based’ refers to how the influenza (flu) vaccine is made. Most inactivated flu vaccines are produced by growing flu viruses in eggs. The flu viruses used in the cell-based vaccines are grown in cultured cells of mammalian origin instead of in hens’ eggs.

• Cell-culture flu shot (e.g., Flucelvax) is a quadrivalent vaccine produced on animal cell lines instead of chicken eggs. The particular animal cell line used was dog kidney cells infected with Coronaviruses. This is why I believe that Ivermectin works so well to treat CoVid-19.

Who can get Flucelvax Quadrivalent?
Flucelvax Quadrivalent is the only cell-based inactivated flu vaccine that has been licensed by the FDA for use in the United States. Flucelvax Quadrivalent is licensed for use in people 4 years and older.

Flu Vaccine does not work in older people

Trump signs order to improve flu-vaccine development – September 2019

• The US government wants to develop a universal vaccine and make seasonal vaccines more effective. The US government is launching a programme to modernize the development of flu vaccines. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on 19 September directing the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Defense to propose a plan and budget for the effort within 120 days.

• The goal is to improve the country’s ability to prepare for a future outbreak of pandemic flu, and to develop better vaccines to protect against seasonal outbreaks. The programme will support research to develop a universal flu vaccine to replace the seasonal vaccine developed each year. The government also plans to create a strategy for switching to faster methods of producing seasonal flu vaccines, a senior administration official told reporters on 19 September. Currently, manufacturers produce most flu vaccines using chicken eggs, a process that takes at least six months.

• Influenza viruses mutate constantly, so the strains that circulate differ from year to year. This means that vaccines must be tailor-made for each flu season. But over the past decade, flu vaccines have only been about 45% effective. That’s partly because the slow process of producing vaccines in eggs creates a months-long lag between when researchers predict which strains are likely to circulate during flu season and when vaccines reach the public. In years with especially bad mismatches between a vaccine and the virus, the effectiveness of a flu vaccine can drop to less than 20%.

Better and faster
• Two faster production methods exist, both of which have been used to make vaccines that are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). But those vaccines are more expensive than the ones made using chicken eggs.

• One of the faster techniques, which uses cell cultures, can also produce more effective vaccines than do egg-based approaches, according to the FDA. The agency estimated that during the 2017–2018 season, one cell-based vaccine protected about 20% more people than did vaccines made using conventional methods. Another study1 found that the cell-based vaccine protected 10% more people age 65 or older compared with egg-based ones. Cell-based vaccines account for 10–15% of the US flu vaccine market.

• The second method uses recombinant technology and involves inserting influenza virus genes into insect cells. The cells then churn out a vaccine, which workers harvest and purify. This technique can produce vaccines within six to eight weeks and accounts for about 1–2% of the market.

If SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated . . . How can an effective vaccine be developed?

• Chief epidemiologist of Chinese CDC admits: ‘They didn’t isolate the virus’. No – they have never seen the alleged ‘virus’ code or isolated ‘it’ from other genetic material, bacteria and toxins in a laboratory – instead they created a computer-generated fiction to terrify the world into accepting fascism

• What if the ‘sky-is-falling’ coronavirus models are wrong?

• Revealed: COVID19 Is Really A CDC Computer-Generated ‘Virus’

Creating the illusion of a pandemic through diagnostic tests.

If the RT-PCR test works . . . Why so many false positives?

Beware of 2 unreliable and untrustworthy tests:
• the PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction)
• the antibody tests

As with other diseases these tests were used to falsely claim that Ebola was responsible for the 2014 outbreak. The PCR test is prone to misidentification and contamination errors as it relies on growing such a tiny amount of viral fragment sample and can only produce qualitative results not quantitative, meaning that it cannot indicate whether or not a person has enough virus in them to get sick…

The antibody test if carried out correctly (as this test is frequently prone to errors) has the same problems in that it can only produce qualitative results. It can only tell if the person tested has antibodies for the specific virus. This would at least indicate that the person had at one time contracted the virus. However, it cannot tell whether or not the person presently has enough of the virus to get sick or have any virus in them at all. Thus, in both cases highly questionable results have been used to indicate sickness and disease.

• Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests as Unreliable & Unlawful to Quarantine People

• WHO PCR 47 (!) Cycles

• CT over 35 is non-infectious

Cycle Thresholds are too Damn High

• Right on Cue for Biden, WHO Admits High-Cycle PCR Tests Produce COVID False Positives: Thursday January 21, 2021- One day after Inauguration.

• The W.H.O. conveniently reduces the number of cycles required for a Positive CoVid result using the fraudulent PCR test the exact same day that Beijing Biden is inaugurated! Now all of a sudden, we will see all the CoVid cases go away.

If Kary Mullis, the inventor of the RT-PCR test who conveniently died in August 2019, says his test shouldn’t be used to diagnose infectious diseases . . .–inventor-of-the-pcr-technique–dies-66256

Why use it to detect SARS-CoV-2?

• A Global Human Experiment

If there is an epidemic . . . Why so many empty hospitals?

• Majority of field hospitals will be shut down after going unused

• COVID-19: Inside the Hospitals & Why the Lockdown?

If large numbers of people are dying from SARS-CoV-2 . . . Why so many fake causes of death-on-death certificates?

• While COVID-19 is a serious threat, the death count has been exaggerated. Underfunded and cash-strapped hospitals have been financially incentivized to record as many COVID-related deaths as possible, resulting in a statistically significant number of falsely reported COVID-related deaths. On top of that, hospitals have also been heavily incentivized to put patients on ventilators, which has also contributed to many additional unnecessary deaths.

• CDC Exposed: Inflated Covid Deaths By 1600% Throughout The Election, “Violated Multiple Federal Laws” Peer-Reviewed Study Finds…State, Local Governments Must Act

• Only 6% of deaths reported to the CDC died from Covid. The other 94% had Comorbidities.

If SARS-CoV-2 exists . . . Why give doctors financial incentives to diagnose SARS-CoV-2?

• “Hospital administrators might well want to see COVID-19 attached to a discharge summary or a death certificate. Why? Because if it’s a straightforward, garden-variety pneumonia that a person is admitted to the hospital for – if they’re Medicare – typically, the diagnosis-related group lump sum payment would be $5,000. But if it’s COVID-19 pneumonia, then it’s $13,000, and if that COVID-19 pneumonia patient ends up on a ventilator, it goes up to $39,000.”

There is an FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) law which only allows the mass “vaccination” program to continue if there are no other effective treatments. There is also a EUA “National Security” stipulation that requires a significant percentage of the population to be at risk of death, which is another reason why fraudulent false-positive testing is being used.

But as you can see:

• The United States has had effective treatments for years and N.I.H. Fauchi has known about these treatments since at least 2005.

Professor Thomas Borody developer of the triple therapy treatment for peptic ulcers in 1987. “It’s easier than treating the flu now”. “You can actually eradicate it”. “We know it’s curable”

• Ivermectin + Doxycycline + Zinc.

• Senate testimony by Dr. Pierre Kory (FLCCC Alliance, in early December.

• Swiss Policy Research HCQ+ Treatment Protocol (5-to-7-day regimen)

• We have many treatments for CoVid 19. No Vaccine is necessary

This mid-June study published by The Journal of Antibiotics, entitled, “Ivermectin: a systematic review from antiviral effects to COVID-19 complementary regimen,” summarizes the effects of Ivermectin as a stand-alone treatment: “Ivermectin proposes many potentials effects to treat a range of diseases, with its antimicrobial, antiviral, and anti-cancer properties as a wonder drug. It is highly effective against many microorganisms including some viruses.

Ivermectin plays a role in several biological mechanisms, therefore it could serve as a potential candidate in the treatment of a wide range of viruses including COVID-19 as well as other types of positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses. In this systematic review, we showed antiviral effects of ivermectin on a broad range of RNA and DNA viruses by reviewing all related evidence since 1970. This study presents the possibility that ivermectin could be a useful antiviral agent in several viruses including those with positive-sense single-stranded RNA, in similar fashion.

Since significant effectiveness of ivermectin is seen in the early stages of infection in experimental studies, it is proposed that ivermectin administration may be effective in the early stages or prevention. “Ivermectin, owing to its antiviral activity, may play a pivotal role in several essential biological processes, therefore it could serve as a potential candidate in the treatment of different types of viruses including COVID-19.” Since this study has been done, the new triple therapy, with additions of Zinc and Doxycycline to Ivermectin, have, as previously stated, been proven in clinical trials and has now been successfully administered to thousands of COVID-19 infected patients worldwide.

Here are excerpts from the original scientific study by Monash University and the Doherty Institute, which first proved that Ivermectin kills SARS-CoV-2 in vitro: The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro

• Ivermectin is an inhibitor of the COVID-19 causative virus (SARS-CoV-2) in vitro.
• A single treatment able to effect ~5000-fold reduction in virus at 48 h in cell culture.
• Ivermectin is FDA-approved for parasitic infections, and therefore has a potential for repurposing.
• Ivermectin is widely available, due to its inclusion on the WHO model list of essential medicines.

Summary of the Borody Treatment Protocol for COVID-19
• Ivermectin 12mg – once a day – Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8 (only)
• Doxycycline 100mg – twice a day – Day 1 until Day 10
• Zinc supplement – once a day – Day 1 until Day 10

Sources of Ivermectin Tablets
Preferably get a prescription for Ivermectin tablets like Stromectol from your local doctor. Generic versions of Ivermectin tablets can also be ordered from India, for example
Ivecop via manufactured by TOSC International and marketed by Menarini. They ship worldwide.

• The Borody Protocol – 2020-08 – First line treatment for COVID-19
• The Borody Protocol – 2020-08 – Prophylactic COVID-19 treatment

If the official COVID-19 narrative is defensible . . . Why censor people who dispute the narrative?

If people understood that we have had effective treatments all along and that the medical tyranny that we have all been put under was never necessary people might actually start to stand up for themselves and stop following the other kids jumping off the bridge!

• The Emergency Use Authorization Act does not cover Experimental Gene Therapies.

• The Emergency Use Authorization Act does not say anything about “Experimental” Gene Therapies and the approval is only valid if there are NO Effective treatments available, and as we ALL KNOW we have several EFFECTIVE TREATMENTS.

• WHO: No Guarantee COVID Vaccines Will Prevent People from Being Infected? or

• On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).

• After a little research it turns out that Syncytin-1 is also present in sperm, so it’s not only Women that will be sterilized but Men as well.

It was never really about the Vaccine, although; the vaccine (gene therapy) accomplished killing off more of the population which is a plus for these globalist sick bastards, it was about using the crisis to achieve the ultimate goal:

The Ultimate take-over of Humanity – Depopulation – The Great Reset

Deagel Makes Mysterious Changes To 2025 Population Forecast For America As Bill Gates Launches ‘Grand Challenge’: The ‘Holy Grail Of Influenza Research’ And ‘Bridging The Valley Of Death’

Here are 42 resources that prove masks are harmful for healthy people.

  1. T Jefferson, M Jones, et al. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. MedRxiv. 2020 Apr 7.
  2. J Xiao, E Shiu, et al. Non-pharmaceutical measures for pandemic influenza in non-healthcare settings – personal protective and environmental measures. Centers for Disease Control. 26(5); 2020 May.
  3. J Brainard, N Jones, et al. Facemasks and similar barriers to prevent respiratory illness such as COVID19: A rapid systematic review. MedRxiv. 2020 Apr 1.
  4. L Radonovich M Simberkoff, et al. N95 respirators vs medical masks for preventing influenza among health care personnel: a randomized clinic trial. JAMA. 2019 Sep 3. 322(9): 824-833.
  5. J Smith, C MacDougall. CMAJ. 2016 May 17. 188(8); 567-574.
  6. F bin-Reza, V Lopez, et al. The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: a systematic review of the scientific evidence. 2012 Jul; 6(4): 257-267.
  7. J Jacobs, S Ohde, et al. Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Infect Control. 2009 Jun; 37(5): 417-419.
  8. M Viola, B Peterson, et al. Face coverings, aerosol dispersion and mitigation of virus transmission risk.,
  9. S Grinshpun, H Haruta, et al. Performance of an N95 filtering facepiece particular respirator and a surgical mask during human breathing: two pathways for particle penetration. J Occup Env Hygiene. 2009; 6(10):593-603.
  10. H Jung, J Kim, et al. Comparison of filtration efficiency and pressure drop in anti-yellow sand masks, quarantine masks, medical masks, general masks, and handkerchiefs. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2013 Jun. 14:991-1002.
  11. C MacIntyre, H Seale, et al. A cluster randomized trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(4)
  12. N95 masks explained.
  13. V Offeddu, C Yung, et al. Effectiveness of masks and respirators against infections in healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Inf Dis. 65(11), 2017 Dec 1; 1934-1942.
  14. C MacIntyre, Q Wang, et al. A cluster randomized clinical trial comparing fit-tested and non-fit-tested N95 respirators to medical masks to prevent respiratory virus infection in health care workers. Influenza J. 2010 Dec 3.
  15. M Walker. Study casts doubt on N95 masks for the public. MedPage Today. 2020 May 20.
  16. C MacIntyre, Q Wang, et al. A cluster randomized clinical trial comparing fit-tested and non-fit-tested N95 respirators to medical masks to prevent respiratory virus infection in health care workers. Influenza J. 2010 Dec 3.
  17. N Shimasaki, A Okaue, et al. Comparison of the filter efficiency of medical nonwoven fabrics against three different microbe aerosols. Biocontrol Sci. 2018; 23(2). 61-69.
  18. T Tunevall’s. Postoperative wound infections and surgical face masks: A controlled study. World J Surg. 1991 May; 15: 383-387.
  19. N Orr. Is a mask necessary in the operating theatre? Ann Royal Coll Surg Eng 1981: 63: 390-392.
  20. N Mitchell, S Hunt. Surgical face masks in modern operating rooms – a costly and unnecessary ritual? J Hosp Infection. 18(3); 1991 Jul 1. 239-242.
  21. C DaZhou, P Sivathondan, et al. Unmasking the surgeons: the evidence bases behind the use of facemasks in surgery. JR Soc Med. 2015 Jun; 108(6): 223-228.
  22. L Brosseau, M Sietsema. Commentary: Masks for all for Covid-19 not based on sound data. U Minn Ctr Inf Dis Res Pol. 2020 Apr 1.
  23. N Leung, D Chu, et al. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks Nature Research. 2020 Mar 7. 26,676-680 (2020).
  24. S Rengasamy, B Eimer, et al. Simple respiratory protection – evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20-1000 nm size particles. Ann Occup Hyg. 2010 Oct; 54(7): 789-798.
  25. S Bae, M Kim, et al. Effectiveness of surgical and cotton masks in blocking SARS-CoV-2: A controlled comparison in 4 patients. Ann Int Med. 2020 Apr 6.
  26. S Rengasamy, B Eimer, et al. Simple respiratory protection – evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20-1000 nm size particles. Ann Occup Hyg. 2010 Oct; 54(7): 789-798.
  27. C MacIntyre, H Seale, et al. A cluster randomized trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(4)
  28. W Kellogg. An experimental study of the efficacy of gauze face masks. Am J Pub Health. 1920. 34-42.
  29. M Klompas, C Morris, et al. Universal masking in hospitals in the Covid-19 era. N Eng J Med. 2020; 382 e63.
  30. E Person, C Lemercier et al. Effect of a surgical mask on six-minute walking distance. Rev Mal Respir. 2018 Mar; 35(3):264-268.
  31. B Chandrasekaran, S Fernandes. Exercise with facemask; are we handling a devil’s sword – a physiological hypothesis. Med Hypothese. 2020 Jun 22. 144:110002.
  32. P Shuang Ye Tong, A Sugam Kale, et al. Respiratory consequences of N95-type mask usage in pregnant healthcare workers – A controlled clinical study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2015 Nov 16; 4:48.
  33. T Kao, K Huang, et al. The physiological impact of wearing an N95 mask during hemodialysis as a precaution against SARS in patients with end-stage renal disease. J Formos Med Assoc. 2004 Aug; 103(8):624-628.
  34. F Blachere, W Lindsley et al. Assessment of influenza virus exposure and recovery from contaminated surgical masks and N95 respirators. J Viro Methods. 2018 Oct; 260:98-106.
  35. A Rule, O Apau, et al. Healthcare personnel exposure in an emergency department during influenza season. PLoS One. 2018 Aug 31; 13(8): e0203223.
  36. F Blachere, W Lindsley et al. Assessment of influenza virus exposure and recovery from contaminated surgical masks and N95 respirators. J Viro Methods. 2018 Oct; 260:98-106.
  37. A Chughtai, S Stelzer-Braid, et al. Contamination by respiratory viruses on our surface of medical masks used by hospital healthcare workers. BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jun 3; 19(1): 491.
  38. L Zhiqing, C Yongyun, et al. J Orthop Translat. 2018 Jun 27; 14:57-62.
  39. C MacIntyre, H Seale, et al. A cluster randomized trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(4)
  40. A Beder, U Buyukkocak, et al. Preliminary report on surgical mask induced deoxygenation during major surgery. Neurocirugia. 2008; 19: 121-126.
  41. D Lukashev, B Klebanov, et al. Cutting edge: Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha and its activation-inducible short isoform negatively regulate functions of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2006 Oct 15; 177(8) 4962-4965.
  42. A Sant, A McMichael. Revealing the role of CD4+ T-cells in viral immunity. J Exper Med. 2012 Jun 30; 209(8):1391-1395.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s