100% Recovery from CoVid 19 with Early and Prophylactic Use
I have previously written about the effectiveness of Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc, and Z-Pak
Links are Here 1. here 2. and here 3.
I have just come across new information on another effective triple therapy: Ivermectin, Zinc, and Doxycycline that is just as effective as the Hydroxychloroquine combo with even less chance of any side effects. Below is the information taken from various studies. Please share this information with everyone you know. We now have two very inexpensive and effective treatments that result in an (over 95%) recovery rate for CoVid 19. We do not need to continue these ridiculous lockdowns. We do not need to wear a mask. As I detail in the above links, “Masks do not work”.
One America News posted a video on Ivermectin
Doctors could soon have a new tool in their arsenal for the fight against the coronavirus. One America’s Pearson Sharp has more on the medicine that researchers in Australia say could cure the virus in just 48-hours.
It may be time to look in the Veterinarians closet to see what other medicines could be effective in treating viruses and cancers. Here are two medicines that are currently being used successfully by Vets around the world.
Ivermectin and Fenbendazole are both Anthelmintics.
Anthelmintics or antihelminthics are a group of antiparasitic drugs that expel parasitic worms (helminths) and other internal parasites from the body by either stunning or killing them and without causing significant damage to the host. They may also be called vermifuges (those that stun) or vermicides (those that kill). Anthelmintics are used to treat people who are infected by helminths, a condition called helminthiasis. These drugs are also used to treat infected animals.
Fenbendazole acts as a moderate microtubule destabilizing agent and causes cancer cell death by modulating multiple cellular pathways
HEARTGARD® is also (ivermectin) Chewables, given orally using the recommended dose and regimen, are effective against the tissue larval stage of Dirofilaria immitis for a month (30 days) after infection and, as a result, prevent the development of the adult stage. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/fda/fdaDrugXsl.cfm?setid=4b7d8192-d148-44d2-8a69-d533718f7263&type=display#:~:text=HEARTGARD%C2%AE%20(ivermectin)%20Chewables%2C,development%20of%20the%20adult%20stage.
Ivermectin-based treatments have cured hundreds of thousands of COVID-19 infected patients worldwide. Ivermectin has also successfully protected thousands of doctors who have been treating COVID-19 infected patients. As the evidence throughout this report reveals, scientific studies and clinical trials have proven that Ivermectin-based treatments kill the SARS-CoV-2 virus in humans with little, if any, side effects. Even better news than all of that, Ivermectin when combined with Zinc is effective in killing many RNA viruses, such as the common cold, influenza, SARS, COVID-19, Dengue Virus, hepatitis C, hepatitis E, West Nile fever, Ebola, rabies, polio, and measles. As The Journal of Antibiotics recently reported: “Ivermectin proposes many potential effects to treat a range of diseases, with its antimicrobial, antiviral, and anti-cancer properties as a wonder drug. Zika, dengue, yellow fever, West Nile, Hendra, Newcastle, Venezuelan equine encephalitis, chikungunya, Semliki Forest, Sindbis, Avian influenza A, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome, Human immunodeficiency virus type 1, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Furthermore, there are some studies showing antiviral effects of Ivermectin against DNA viruses such as Equine herpes type 1, BK polyomavirus, pseudorabies, porcine circovirus 2, and bovine herpesvirus 1”
In a previous extensive review of Ivermectin, The Journal of Antibiotics also reported: “Over the past decade, the global scientific community has begun to recognize the unmatched value of an extraordinary drug, Ivermectin. Today, Ivermectin is continuing to surprise and excite scientists, offering more and more promise to help improve global public health by treating a diverse range of diseases, with its unexpected potential as an antibacterial, antiviral and anti-cancer agent being particularly extraordinary. Today, Ivermectin remains a relatively unknown drug, although few, if any, other drugs can rival Ivermectin for its beneficial impact on human health and welfare.” Ivermectin mass drug administration also bestows significant secondary community-wide health and socioeconomic benefits due to its impact on non-target infections. Ivermectin is therefore very safe for vertebrates, as it cannot cross the blood-brain barrier. Ivermectin is already deployed to treat a variety of infections and diseases, most of which primarily afflict the world’s poor. But it is the new opportunities with respect to Ivermectin usage, or re-purposing it to control a completely new range of diseases, that is generating interest and excitement in the scientific and global health research communities.
The following are an indication of the divergent disease-fighting potential that has been identified for ivermectin thus far: Myiasis, Trichinosis, Disease vector control, Malaria, Leishmaniasis, African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness), American trypanosomiasis (Chagas disease), Schistosomiasis, Bedbugs, Rosacea, Asthma, Epilepsy, Neurological disease, Antiviral (e.g. HIV, dengue, encephalitis), Antibacterial (tuberculosis and Buruli ulcer), Anti-cancer.
There is a continuously accumulating body of evidence that Ivermectin may have substantial value in the treatment of a variety of cancers. Essentially, a unique, multifaceted ‘wonder’ drug of the past and present may yet become an even more exceptional drug of the future.” The antiviral action of Ivermectin makes it a safer, less expensive, and more effective way to deal with viruses than vaccines. In fact, Ivermectin makes many vaccines unnecessary. The best news of all, Ivermectin is inexpensive, readily available and well over one billion people throughout the world have safely taken it. Ivermectin has a storied history as a “wonder drug.” It has been around for over 45 years and has a long-proven safety profile earning a place on the World Health Organization’s list of essential medicines. It is also commonly given to children to safely treat head lice. In addition, throughout the United States alone over $1 billion per year of Ivermectin is given to animals safely.
There are 8,532 results peer reviewed studies on Ivermectin. When it comes to Ivermectin COVID-19 treatments, there are presently 105 results published studies and 47 clinical trials. In 2004, the World Health Organization issued a bulletin headlined, “Mass treatment with Ivermectin: an underutilized public health strategy,” which states, “It is time to capitalize on the full public health potential of Ivermectin.” Based on the latest studies in response to the COVID-19 virus, Ivermectin’s potential is now being realized.
However, there is one major problem: Large pharmaceutical companies, who stand to lose over a trillion dollars in revenue, along with corrupted government and “health” officials are suppressing Ivermectin-based life-saving treatments. In addition, the mainstream media, Google and large social media companies are proactively censoring information on Ivermectin’s success in curing COVID-19 patients. The bottom line, as the evidence throughout this report reveals, we now have a proven prophylactic (preventive) treatment and COVID-19 cure. If this life-saving medicine is not widely distributed now, the interests suppressing this treatment and censoring information on it are clearly complicit in Crimes Against Humanity.
Triple Therapy COVID-19 Cure: Ivermectin, Zinc, and Doxycycline
Ivermectin, Zinc and Doxycycline is an effective treatment because it has very few side-effects and is a real killer of coronavirus.” “This drug works both as a preventative from infection and as a cure for people who are already suffering symptoms. It is anti-parasitic. It is used across South America, the U.S.A., India, and Bangladesh. In those places, trials were done. The amazing and surprising thing is, there is not one paper where it was successful less than 100%. That’s not very easy to believe, because it is just too good to be true. Nevertheless, that is the actual factual result. It is curative within 6 to 8 days. There are so many doctors who take it around the world, and don’t tell you about it until you ask them, as a preventative for themselves not to catch it, because often they are frontline workers…. I take it myself.” “There are doctors in Australia who take it. There are so many [doctors] in the U.S. who take it, and it doesn’t come out in the news.
Many physicians in the U.S. who developed COVID [after taking it] within 24 hours their symptoms disappear. It is a very rapidly acting treatment in clinical medicine. It is not covered in the media because there is no big pharmaceutical company behind it. No one can make any money off of it because it is cheap, it is rapidly available now, we will not run out of it, but there is no huge pharmaceutical companies behind it… so it just didn’t get a lot of airing [on mainstream news outlets]. ~ Dr. Thomas Borody, CDD Medical Director
The Ivermectin, Zinc, and Doxycycline triple therapy treatment was developed by an internationally renowned physician and Australia’s Centre for Digestive Disease (CDD) Medical Director Thomas Borody. He already has four FDA-approved drugs and is famous for developing a triple therapy cure for peptic ulcers, which saved millions of people worldwide. He used the same methodology to come up with this Ivermectin-based treatment, which now has, as Trial Site News reported, “over 30 formal clinical trials, many observational real-world initiatives and… thousands of doctors successfully using this treatment worldwide.”
Here is a compilation video featuring interviews with Dr. Borody and several doctors throughout the world summing up their successful Ivermectin-based COVID-19 treatments:
Here is the transcript of Dr. Borody describing how the treatment works:
The main thing about it, it is safe. It has been around since 1975 and it is broad-spectrum; it kills viruses, bacteria, and parasites. Especially in a test tube, it was 5000 times more powerful than anything else. The trouble was, it was a high dose in a test tube. So, what we added to it was an anti-biotic that is also anti-parasitic and anti-viral, which is Doxycycline. We could then reduce the dose and add a general endosome-active agent called Zinc, and we were surprised at how amazingly well it cures coronavirus.” “I am speaking as a person who repurposes multiple drugs for killing intracellular, inside cells, bacteria, and viruses.
This Ivermectin and others inhibit intracellular proteins that help this virus multiply in our cells because they cannot multiply on their own. They have to enter our cells, and that’s where you nab them. As Mount Sinai Hospital just published, Ivermectin blocks the landing sights on the spike of the receptors called AC2 receptor throughout the lungs and the gut, and secondly, it inhibits replication within the cell by using Zinc which forces or helps to get in the cells. Doxycycline helps in those two areas as well. The threat production stops dead, and I am still surprised how well it works, and how few side effects that it has. There are a number of studies that are amazingly successful. In fact, we haven’t seen a result that is under 100%. We’ve used it in the United States. We had a 14-hospital trial in Bangladesh, and we got 100 out of 100 [cured]. In China, they reproduced it and got 60 out of 60 cured.
All three medicines in this triple therapy are already FDA-approved and readily available. We can start taking it en masse now; as Dr. Borody sums it up: “These three medications are already approved. They do not need pre-clinical or clinical trials or additional TGA approvals. An Ivermectin tablet can cost as little as $2 – which could make it by far the cheapest, safest, and fastest cure. We should identify anyone who is positive and treat them, and those who are around them, give them a half dose preventative treatment. Those who are on the frontlines should all be given preventative treatment because the side effects are so minuscule. I don’t know why we haven’t started treating before. The drug has been around so long. We know it is safe to use. If nothing else, make it available in aged care homes immediately! Our elderly are at the highest risk and this is a very safe option, especially when we have nothing else except ventilators. Also, our frontline workers deserve more protection with a preventative medication like this, and as an emergency treatment if they test positive.
You can also watch a recent Sky News Australian television interview with Dr. Borody, which is being censored on Facebook, entitled, “Ivermectin treatment ‘could bring us all together by Christmas'”
How Ivermectin Works Against COVID-19 and other RNA Viruses
Dr. Trevor Marshall, director of the Autoimmunity Research Foundation, a fellow of the European Association for Predictive, Preventive and Personalized Medicine, and former Chair of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society of the Ventura IEEE discusses how Ivermectin works to kill COVID-19 and other RNA viruses: “Ivermectin is the only known drug that stops viral replication, and then Zinc kills the virus. A very small dose, just 15 milligrams for a typical adult kills coronavirus. One dose is going to beat this deadly disease. It is very tough for physicians to get their minds around it. This drug kills all RNA viruses. This drug is effective against influenza, even the Spanish flu. This drug is improving overall health way beyond what the COVID itself is involved with. Other viruses that people have picked up over the years are being killed. Ivermectin is given for hair lice at school. There is no reason to delay it. Now there are a lot of studies, case reports, entire cities even that are giving out Ivermectin to its citizens. Ivermectin is a game-changer.” (Watch Video)
Ivermectin COVID-19 Treatment Protocol
Here are excerpts from a recent press release featuring Dr. Borody’s COVID-19 treatment protocol: “Triple therapy specialist Professor Thomas Borody today released the COVID-19 treatment protocol to Australian GPs, who can legally prescribe it to their COVID-19 positive patients and can also prescribe it as a preventative medication. Borody says this could be the fastest and safest way to end the pandemic.” Professor Thomas Borody MB, BS, BSc (Med), MD, Ph.D., DSc, FRACP, FACP, FACG, AGAF, FRS(N) said:
The three medications are on chemist shelves right now. GPs can email GP@CDD.com.au to obtain the dosing protocol and COVID-19 treatment information for their patients. GPs can legally prescribe the therapy today as an ‘off label’ treatment… a standard practice in medicine. In fact, more than 60% of prescriptions in Australia are ‘off-label’. It’s not a new concept. It’s happening every day to manage diseases and save lives.’ Professor Borody continued, ‘Why are we just waiting around for a vaccine? To save lives we should be using whatever is safe and available right now. We could lead the world in this fight.’ ‘Australia has some of the best medical and science people in the world – indeed the Ivermectin connection was first discovered by Dr. Kylie Wagstaff’s team at Monash University in April. How long do we need to wait before Australian politicians get behind Australian medical science and use ‘war room’ tactics with safe and approved medications?
See Professor Borody’s published research at ORCID
No trial has shown Ivermectin-based therapy to be ineffective. In fact, international data reports an almost 100% cure rate and a symptom improvement within 4-6 days,’ said Professor Borody. The Government could end the pandemic by openly encouraging GPs to prescribe these TGA approved medications,’ said Professor Borody
Summary of the Borody Treatment Protocol for COVID-19
- Ivermectin 12mg – once a day – Day 1, Day 4 and Day 8 (only)
- Doxycycline 100mg – twice a day – Day 1 until Day 10
- Zinc supplement – once a day – Day 1 until Day 10
- If you are not a doctor, consult your doctor before taking any of these medications!
- Most doctors recommend a dosage of Ivermectin of 0.2 mg per kg of body weight, which means that 60 kg body weight leads to a 12 mg dose.
- The Borody protocol does not mention the exact dosage of zinc in the attached documents, but most other doctors have recommended 50 mg of zinc per day as zinc picolinate or another easily absorbed chelated zinc supplement.
Sources of Ivermectin Tablets
Additional Sites for Prevention and Treatment with Ivermectin
Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance Prevention & Treatment Protocols for COVID-19: https://www.thecompleteguidetohealth.com/ivermectinprotocols.htm
How to get Ivermectin – https://covid19criticalcare.com/network-support/the-flccc-alliance/
Disclaimer: This medication protocol is intended specifically for the patient being treated based on the consultation and investigations by their Doctor.”
THE COVID BLOG
OFFICIAL BLOG OF COVID LEGAL USA. VACCINES ARE THE LEADING CAUSE OF COINCIDENCES. STAY VIGILANT. https://thecovidblog.com/
Ivermectin: Nobel Prize-Winning ‘Wonder Drug’
Ivermectin has a storied history as a “wonder drug.” William C. Campbell, Satoshi Ōmura, and Tu Youyou won the Nobel Prize in Medicine for their work in developing Ivermectin. It is poetic how Ivermectin is an ancient Chinese herbal remedy that was modified by an American biologist.
As The Nobel Assembly summed it up its development:
Diseases caused by parasites have plagued humankind for millennia and constitute a major global health problem. This year’s Nobel Laureates have developed therapies that have revolutionized the treatment of some of the most devastating parasitic diseases.” William C. Campbell and Satoshi Ōmura discovered a new drug, Avermectin, the derivatives of which have radically lowered the incidence of River Blindness and Lymphatic Filariasis, as well as showing efficacy against an expanding number of other parasitic diseases. Tu Youyou discovered Artemisinin, a drug that has significantly reduced the mortality rates for patients suffering from Malaria. These two discoveries have provided humankind with powerful new means to combat these debilitating diseases that affect hundreds of millions of people annually. The consequences in terms of improved human health and reduced suffering are immeasurable. Satoshi Ōmura, a Japanese microbiologist and expert in isolating natural products, focused on a group of bacteria, Streptomyces, which lives in the soil and was known to produce a plethora of agents with antibacterial activities. William C. Campbell, an expert in parasite biology working in the USA, acquired Ōmura’s Streptomyces cultures and explored their efficacy. Campbell showed that a component from one of the cultures was remarkably efficient against parasites in domestic and farm animals. The bioactive agent was purified and named Avermectin, which was subsequently chemically modified to a more effective compound called Ivermectin. Ivermectin was later tested in humans with parasitic infections and effectively killed parasite larvae (microfilaria). Collectively, Ōmura and Campbell’s contributions led to the discovery of a new class of drugs with extraordinary efficacy against parasitic diseases.
By the late 1960s, efforts to eradicate Malaria had failed and the disease was on the rise. At that time, Tu Youyou in China turned to traditional herbal medicine to tackle the challenge of developing novel Malaria therapies. From a large-scale screen of herbal remedies in Malaria-infected animals, an extract from the plant Artemisia annua emerged as an interesting candidate. However, the results were inconsistent, so Tu revisited the ancient literature and discovered clues that guided her in her quest to successfully extract the active component from Artemisia annua. Tu was the first to show that this component, later called Artemisinin, was highly effective against the Malaria parasite, both in infected animals and in humans. Artemisinin represents a new class of antimalarial agents that rapidly kill the Malaria parasites at an early stage of their development, which explains its unprecedented potency in the treatment of severe Malaria. The discoveries of Avermectin and Artemisinin have fundamentally changed the treatment of parasitic diseases. Today the Avermectin-derivative Ivermectin is used in all parts of the world that are plagued by parasitic diseases. Ivermectin is highly effective against a range of parasites, has limited side effects, and is freely available across the globe. The importance of Ivermectin for improving the health and wellbeing of millions of individuals with River Blindness and Lymphatic Filariasis, primarily in the poorest regions of the world, is immeasurable. Treatment is so successful that these diseases are on the verge of eradication, which would be a major feat in the medical history of humankind.
Scientific Studies and Clinical Trials on Successful Ivermectin-based COVID-19 Treatments
Here are several scientific studies and clinical trials as supporting evidence.
This mid-June study published by The Journal of Antibiotics, entitled, “Ivermectin: a systematic review from antiviral effects to COVID-19 complementary regimen,” summarizes the effects of ivermectin as a stand-alone treatment: “Ivermectin proposes many potentials effects to treat a range of diseases, with its antimicrobial, antiviral, and anti-cancer properties as a wonder drug.
It is highly effective against many microorganisms including some viruses. In this comprehensive systematic review, antiviral effects of ivermectin are summarized including in vitro and in vivo studies over the past 50 years.” Several studies reported antiviral effects of ivermectin on RNA viruses such as Zika, dengue, yellow fever, West Nile, Hendra, Newcastle, Venezuelan equine encephalitis, chikungunya, Semliki Forest, Sindbis, Avian influenza A, Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome, Human immunodeficiency virus type 1, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Furthermore, there are some studies showing antiviral effects of ivermectin against DNA viruses such as Equine herpes type 1, BK polyomavirus, pseudorabies, porcine circovirus 2, and bovine herpesvirus 1.
Ivermectin plays a role in several biological mechanisms, therefore it could serve as a potential candidate in the treatment of a wide range of viruses including COVID-19 as well as other types of positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses. In this systematic review, we showed the antiviral effects of ivermectin on a broad range of RNA and DNA viruses by reviewing all related evidence since 1970. This study presents the possibility that ivermectin could be a useful antiviral agent in several viruses including those with positive-sense single-stranded RNA, in a similar fashion. Since the significant effectiveness of ivermectin is seen in the early stages of infection in experimental studies, it is proposed that ivermectin administration may be effective in the early stages or prevention. “Ivermectin, owing to its antiviral activity, may play a pivotal role in several essential biological processes, therefore it could serve as a potential candidate in the treatment of different types of viruses including COVID-19.” Since this study has been done, the new triple therapy, with additions of Zinc and Doxycycline to Ivermectin, have, as previously stated, been proven in clinical trials and has now been successfully administered to thousands of COVID-19 infected patients worldwide. Here are excerpts from the original scientific study by Monash University and the Doherty Institute, which first proved that Ivermectin kills SARS-CoV-2 in vitro:
The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro
• Ivermectin is an inhibitor of the COVID-19 causative virus (SARS-CoV-2) in vitro.
• A single treatment able to effect ~5000-fold reduction in virus at 48 h in cell culture.
• Ivermectin is FDA-approved for parasitic infections and therefore has a potential for repurposing.
• Ivermectin is widely available, due to its inclusion on the WHO model list of essential medicines.
“Although several clinical trials are now underway to test possible therapies, the worldwide response to the COVID-19 outbreak has been largely limited to monitoring/containment. We report here that Ivermectin, an FDA-approved anti-parasitic previously shown to have broad-spectrum antiviral activity in vitro, is an inhibitor of the causative virus (SARS-CoV-2), with a single addition to Vero-hSLAM cells 2 h post-infection with SARS-CoV-2 able to effect ~5000-fold reduction in viral RNA at 48 h.”
Editor’s Note: There have been several news reports and “fact” checking articles that attempt to discredit Ivermectin based on the above scientific study on the grounds that the in vitro dosage is much higher than humans can tolerate without side effects. These reports are misleading. As Dr. Borody has proven, his triple therapy adds Doxycycline and Zinc, which allows Ivermectin to cure COVID-19 in a much lower and safe dosage. Furthermore, as you see throughout this report, many doctors have successfully cured COVID-19 patients with a proven safe and effective dose that is significantly lower than the in vitro dose.
As TrialSite News reported:
“TrialSite has been tracking the use of Ivermectin since researchers at Australia’s Monash University and Peter Doherty Institute found that in the lab’s cell culture the anti-parasitic absolutely destroyed the pathogen. TrialSite found and interviewed doctors from Bangladesh and India to the Dominican Republic, Peru, Columbia and Iraq to the United States where Broward County Health approved an Ivermectin-based protocol with successful outcomes. Search TrialSite for what are now many dozens of relevant real-world data points.”
The Journal of Bangladesh College of Physicians and Surgeons has released a report entitled, “A Case Series of 100 COVID-19 Positive Patients Treated with Combination of Ivermectin and Doxycycline,” stating:
“100 COVID-19 patients were enrolled in this study with predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. RT- PCR of the SERS-CoV-2 will be done at designated government hospitals. The clinical features and response to treatment were noted according to a dedicated protocol.”
Results: In this study males and females were 64 and 36 respectively, the age ranged between 8 to 84 years. Retesting was done between 4 and 18 days of starting medication. All patients tested negative and their symptoms improved within 72 hours. There were no noticeable side effects.
Conclusion: Combination of Ivermectin and doxycycline was found to be very effective in viral clearance in mild and moderately sick COVID-19 patients.”
In China, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University conducted a comparative study on Ivermectin-Doxycycline and Hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin therapy on 116 COVID-19 patients: “Patients were divided randomly into two groups:
Group A [60 patients]: Ivermectin 200μgm/kg single dose + Doxycycline 100mg BID for 10 Days.
Group B [56 patients]: Hydroxychloroquine 400mg 1st day then 200mg BID for 9days + Azithromycin 500mg daily for 5 Days.
PCR for SARS-CoV-2 was repeated in all symptomatic patients on the second day onward without symptoms, or, for those who were asymptomatic (throughout the process), on the 5th day after taking medication and repeated every two days onward if the result is positive. Time to negative PCR and time to full symptomatic recovery was measured for each group.
Results: All subjects in the Ivermectin-Doxycycline group (group A) reached a negative PCR for SARS-CoV-2, at a mean of 8.93 days, and all reached symptomatic recovery, at a mean of 5.93 days, with 55.10% symptom-free by the 5th day. In the Hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin group (group B), 96.36% reached a negative PCR at a mean of 9.33 days and were symptoms-free at a mean of 6.99 days…
Conclusion: With regard to time to become symptom-free, Ivermectin- Doxycycline combination is superior to HCQ-Azithromycin therapy for mild to moderate degrees of COVID-19 patients. In addition, the Ivermectin-Doxycycline combination is superior to HCQ-Azithromycin in terms of safety, side-effect profile, and compliance. We strongly believe that increasing the duration of Ivermectin treatment to 3 days will offer further benefit in reducing the recovery period of COVID beyond that which was seen in our study. This will also prevent disease progression and morbidity to COVID-19 patients.” Université de Lorraine in France also published a study on how Ivermectin inhibits SARS-CoV-2 viral replication:
“Has Ivermectin Virus-Directed Effects against SARS-CoV-2? Rationalizing the Action of a Potential Multitarget Antiviral Agent
Ivermectin is an approved drug used as antiparasitic in humans and animals with well-documented broad-spectrum antiviral properties that emerge from host-directed effects. Here, we employ advanced molecular dynamics simulations to assess the influence of ivermectin on several key viral protein targets, with the aim to reveal the molecular bases of antiviral mechanisms against SARS-CoV-2. Interestingly, we show that ivermectin could be regarded as a multitarget agent, inhibiting different viral functions.
These include blocking the recognition by the SARS-CoV-2 Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of the Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2), the interactions with the two viral proteases 3CLpro and PLpro, and the SARS Unique Domain (SUD) non-structural protein. Hence, the wide spectrum of actions involving i) the interference with cell infection, ii) the inhibition of viral replication, and iii) illusion of the host immune system, could point to an unprecedented synergy between host- and virus-directed effects explaining the high anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity observed for this compound.” To understand how Zinc inhibits the replication of coronaviruses in general, here is an older study published on the National Library of Medicine’s PubMed.gov:
“Zn (2+) inhibits coronavirus and Arterivirus RNA polymerase activity in vitro and zinc ionophores block the replication of these viruses in cell culture
Increasing the intracellular Zn (2+) concentration with zinc-ionophores like pyrithione (PT) can efficiently impair the replication of a variety of RNA viruses, including poliovirus and influenza viruses. For some viruses, this effect has been attributed to interference with viral polyprotein processing. In this study, we demonstrate that the combination of Zn (2+) and PT at low concentrations (2 µM Zn (2+) and 2 µM PT) inhibits the replication of SARS-coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and equine arteritis virus (EAV) in cell culture.
The RNA synthesis of these two distantly related nidoviruses is catalyzed by an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), which is the core enzyme of their multiprotein replication and transcription complex (RTC). Using an activity assay for RTCs isolated from cells infected with SARS-CoV or EAV — thus eliminating the need for PT to transport Zn (2+) across the plasma membrane — we show that Zn (2+) efficiently inhibits the RNA-synthesizing activity of the RTCs of both viruses. Enzymatic studies using recombinant RdRps (SARS-CoV nsp12 and EAV nsp9) purified from E. coli subsequently revealed that Zn (2+) directly inhibited the in vitro activity of both nidovirus polymerases. More specifically, Zn (2+) was found to block the initiation step of EAV RNA synthesis, whereas in the case of the SARS-CoV RdRp elongation was inhibited and template binding reduced. By chelating Zn (2+) with MgEDTA, the inhibitory effect of the divalent cation could be reversed, which provides a novel experimental tool for in vitro studies of the molecular details of nidovirus replication and transcription.”
To further understand how Doxycycline inhibits the COVID-19infection, here is a recent commentary published on Frontiers in Medicine:
“Doxycycline: From Ocular Rosacea to COVID-19 Anosmia. New Insight into the Coronavirus Outbreak
Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) usually manifests with respiratory symptoms. Similarly, to other human respiratory Coronaviruses (HCoV), it seems to have a neuroinvasive and neurotropic activity. In the retrospective case series study conducted by Mao et al. three categories of neurological symptoms, COVID19-related included central nervous system (CNS) manifestations, peripheral nervous system (PNS) symptoms, and musculoskeletal disorders.
Hyposmia has been reported as a possible peripheral nervous system (PNS) symptom caused by COVID-19 infection. In our experience, smell alteration (hyposmia, anosmia) seems to be one of the first manifestations of COVID-19 disease, with or without the loss of taste (dysgeusia). Sometimes it remains the only symptom; more often, it comes with fatigue, fever, and cough.
We provide a commentary on how COVID-19 could affect the sense of smell and the reason why doxycycline (Dox) could play a role in its recovery. IFNα/β signaling plays a protective role in reducing the virus spread and modulating T cell non-cytolytic antiviral response in limiting viral load. Moreover, some RNA-viruses have developed mechanisms to counteract innate host defense to establish productive infections in their hosts. This is the case of an RNA virus, the vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV). Retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) and melanoma differentiation-associated gene-5 (Mda-5), seem to have an important role in the recognition of RNA viruses. In particular, it has been shown that immune signaling by RIG-I is involved in the generation of IFN-α/β following VSV infection. Under Dox treatment, cells released high levels of RIG-I proteins eliciting autonomous IFN response, thereby inhibiting viral infection in vitro.”
Groundbreaking Broward Health Ivermectin Study
From March 15th – May 11th, 173 COVID-19 patients in four Broward Health hospitals in Florida were given a standard dose of Ivermectin as a stand-alone treatment. Even though they did not include Doxycycline and Zinc, patients treated withIvermectindid significantly better than patients who were not. In the group that did not receive Ivermectin, the mortality rate was 25%. In the group that did receive Ivermectin, the mortality rate was 15%, a 40% reduction in mortality. Among patients with severe respiratory deficiencies or the need for mechanical ventilation, mortality in the group without Ivermectin was 80%, with Ivermectin it was only 38%, a 52% reduction in mortality.
“ICON (Ivermectin in COvid Nineteen) study: Use of Ivermectin is Associated with Lower Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with COVID19
Participants: 280 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (mean age 59.6 years [standard deviation 17.9], 45.4% female), of whom 173 were treated with ivermectin and 107 were usual care were reviewed.
Results: Univariate analysis showed lower mortality in the ivermectin group (25.2% versus 15.0%, OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.96, P=.03). Mortality was also lower among 75 patients with severe pulmonary disease treated with ivermectin (38.8% vs 80.7%, OR 0.15, CI 0.05-0.47, P=.001).After adjustment for between-group differences and mortality risks, the mortality difference remained significant for the entire cohort (OR 0.27, CI 0.09-0.85, p=.03; HR 0.37, CI 0.19-0.71, p=.03).
Conclusions and Relevance: Ivermectin was associated with lower mortality during treatment of COVID-19, especially in patients who required higher inspired oxygen or ventilatory support.” Once again, as many doctors have made clear, you only need a low dose of Ivermectin when taking it with Zinc and Doxycycline. However, based on another recent study, the stand-alone Ivermectin dose used in the above Broward Health study would have been more effective if it was a higher dosage.
In a recent retrospective study by Dr. David Scheim from theUS Public Health Service, a dose as much as 10 times larger than the one administered in Broward can be “well-tolerated” without serious side effects:
“Ivermectin (IVM) for COVID-19 Treatment: Clinical Response at Quasi-Threshold Doses Via Hypothesized Alleviation of CD147-Mediated Vascular Occlusion
A retrospective study of 173 COVID-19 patients treated with IVM in four [Broward Health] Florida hospitals at a dose of 200 µg/kg yielded a 40% reduction in mortality compared with 107 controls (15.0% vs. 25.2%, p=0.03). Mortality was cut by 52% with IVM for patients having severe pulmonary disease (38.8% vs. 80.7%, p=0.001). Stabilization and then improvement over 1-2 days frequently occurred for patients who had rapidly deteriorating oxygen status. It is proposed that higher doses of IVM could yield sharply greater clinical benefits. In several clinical studies, IVM at doses of up to 2,000 µg/kg, ten times that used in the [Broward Health] Florida study, were well tolerated.
The potential for major dose-response gains is evaluated based upon studies indicating that IVM shields SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and that this spike protein binds to the CD147 transmembrane receptor as well as to ACE2. The abundant distribution of CD147 on red blood cells (RBCs) suggests a hypothesized ‘catch’ and ‘clump’ framework whereby virally-mediated bindings of RBCs to other RBCs, platelets, white blood cells, and capillary walls impede blood flow, which in turn may underlie key morbidities of COVID-19.
The proposed catch and clump scenario for COVID-19 has a parallel in malaria, for which CD147 is central to the infectious process. The core morbidity of severe malaria is caused by similar clumps and adhesions to endothelium centering around infected RBCs. These underlie the much greater incidence of severe malaria for blood groups A or B vs. O, caused by adhesive RBC membrane trisaccharides associated with blood groups A and B. COVID-19 is likewise much more prevalent for blood groups A or B vs. O. More generally, hemagglutination, the formation of such RBC-pathogen clusters, is common for enveloped viruses. Under this hypothesized framework, a significantly higher rate of capillary flow in younger people could explain a corresponding decreased severity of COIVD-19. This proposed hypothesis and the associated potential for major IVM dose-response gains could be tested, for example, by monitoring blood flow in COVID-19 patients before and after IVM intake using nailfold capillaroscopy.” (watch an interview with Dr. Scheim here)
The Ivermectin Double-Blind Study the Media Refuses to Cover
The Valley View Residence Nursing Home in Toronto gave Ivermectin to elderly residents to treat a scabies outbreak, which happened to coincide with a COVID-19 outbreak throughout the nursing home. Therefore, it inadvertently turned into a double-blind study with a 100 percent success rate. Out of the 170 residents who received Ivermectin, with an average age of 85 and many having comorbidities, none of them died. The daughter of one of the residents contacted health organizations, CCTV, and other media outlets, yet none of them would cover it. After being contacted, Dr. Jennifer Hibberd created this video report about it.
Ivermectin’s Prophylaxis Efficacy
To demonstrate Ivermectin’s efficacy as a prophylaxis (preventative) treatment, this study shows that 0 out of 788 medical professionals treated with Ivermectin were infected by COVID-19, while 58% were infected without the treatment:
Argentine CT shows carrageenan’s prophylactic effect against SARS-CoV-2 infection (Argentina 2020-09-02) Partial Trial Results – Prophylaxis
Argentina’s Hospital Zonal General de Agudos, Hospital Municipal Ángel Marzetti, Hospital Cuenca Alta, and Centro Médico Caseros have released preliminary results of the IVERCAR randomized clinical trial (CT) evaluating iota-carrageenan + ivermectin in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 contagion. The study was carried out between June 1 and August 10, 2020, and recruited 1,195 health professionals, of which 407 received no treatment and 788 self-administered ivermectin oral drops and an iota-carrageenan nasal spray five times per day over 14 days. According to the data released, 58% of participants in the control group resulted infected with the virus during the trial, while no contagions were recorded in the carrageenan + ivermectin arm, showing that the compounds’ virucidal effects can protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, both molecules accumulate in the salivary glands, so they have the potential to prevent viral spread by asymptomatic patients by inactivating the viral particles in the saliva.”
This study by Zagazig University demonstrates Ivermectin’s efficacy in preventing the development of symptomatic infection for individuals who are in close contact with family members who were diagnosed with COVID-19: Zagazig University Randomized Controlled Ivermectin Study Results Confirms PI Hypothesis: Drug Effective Against COVID-19
A principal investor from Zagazig University, Dr. Waheed Shouman, recently completed a randomized, open-label, interventional trial titled, ‘Use of Ivermectin as Prophylactic Option in Asymptomatic Family Close Contact for Patient with COVID-19.’” Targeting 340 participants, this study was completed in late August. This included a total of 304 participants, 203 participants in the ivermectin group, and 101 in the control group. The goal of this investigation was to determine whether ivermectin could serve as a prophylactic and included a 14-day follow-up period involving a diagnosis for symptoms of COVID-19. The findings reveal that ivermectin demonstrates statistically significant benefits for use as a prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic COVID-19 infection in individuals that have been exposed to close family members diagnosed with COVID-19.
This study confirms the author’s hypothesis that ivermectin in fact possesses an antiviral effect and demonstrates efficacy in preventing the development of symptomatic infection for those individuals that have come in close contact to family members diagnosed with COVID-19. [An] accumulation of observational, case series, and even randomized controlled study data points (completed in Iraq and Bangladesh) increasingly weigh toward possible benefit for ivermectin as a low cost, highly available consideration inhibiting COVID-19.” 248,746 Peruvians Infected and Recovered, Many Received Ivermectin. From April through mid-May, there was a major COVID-19 outbreak throughout Peru. In highly populated regions such as Lima, Piura, Loreto, and Iquitos hospitals were overwhelmed.
As this May 7th Guardian article summed up the crisis:
“‘We are living in a catastrophe’: Peru’s jungle capital choking for breath as Covid-19 hits
‘We are living in a catastrophe,’ said Graciela Meza, executive director of the regional health office in Loreto, the vast Amazon region which surrounds the city of half a million inhabitants.
The city’s main public hospital was overflowing with nearly five times the number of patients its 180 beds could hold, said Meza, who herself was recovering from the virus. ‘I’ve never seen anything like this in my life, or even in my dreams,’ said Meza, a lifelong Iquitos resident, who compared the situation to living in a disaster film. ‘Most victims have died from a lack of oxygen; 90% have died because of lack of medical supplies,’ Meza added.”
The infection rate and death count kept spiraling out of control until May 11th, when a private group of doctors and volunteers in Iquitos began to give patients Ivermectin injections. By May 26th, COVID cases decreased significantly, with popular Peruvian news reports declaring, “Iquitos reduces coronavirus cases by almost 70%.” Luis Runciman, dean of the Loreto Medical College, said: “The high number of deaths has not been recorded since the last week of May. There are fewer deaths than in the previous two months. It should also be considered that many people do not go to the hospital; they prefer to take care of themselves in their homes.” More Than 15,000 COVID Patients Successfully Treated After Ivermectin Injections
As Peru’s Diario Ahora reported: “Loreto Solidario private group of volunteers, nurses, and doctors with the help of businessmen continue saving lives in the City of Iquitos
According to the follow-up that they have done in the patients, they did not present any type of complications in their entirety, there are thousands of testimonies that report their improvement the day after having used the medication, without having to use Oxygen. The effectiveness of this medicine is based on using it as soon as you have symptoms. As reported by the person in charge, they have dosed ivermectin 1ml daily for two days to people who have symptoms, including the elderly, with diabetic problems and/or cardiac problems, so far they have treated more than 15 thousand people in the different districts in the city of Iquitos.”
A follow-up study reported: All patients treated with Ivermectin showed improvement
“The study, carried out by the doctor graduated from the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (UNMSM), Gustavo Aguirre, shows that 100% of patients treated with ivermectin showed improvements in their health, specifically, in the development of fever, past 48 hours from the start of the recipe.” Throughout the entire process, the Peruvian Ministry of Health was under attack from so-called medical experts, many of whom are funded by large pharmaceutical companies. They continually made obviously false statements such as this: “[The Peruvian Ministry of Health should] reevaluate and discontinue the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin in the prevention and treatment of Covid-19, due to the risk of adverse reactions and the absence of reliable scientific evidence on the efficacy of these medications.” On June 22d, a regional World Health Organization office, The Pan American Health Organization, issued a statement warning against the use of ivermectin. They said, “ivermectin is incorrectly being used for the treatment of COVID-19, without any scientific evidence of its efficacy and safety for the treatment of this disease.” On July 22nd, a report by Con Nuestro Peru concisely summed up the overall situation: “Charlatans still oppose the use of Ivermectin. Is there a cure for coronavirus?
In summary, those who say that the efficacy of ivermectin against the coronavirus has not been proven lie, since the clinical evidence is irrefutable and abundant. As of today, in Peru, there are 248,746 people infected and recovered from this disease since the start of the pandemic, many of whom received ivermectin and could have been more if it had been used before.”
* Many of the linked reports are written in Spanish. My source for much of this section was journalist Juan Chamie, who has put together a timeline of the events in Peru with news excerpts translated into english here.
Peruvian Physician Movement Advocates for Ivermectin
On August 14th, TrialSite News released a documentary special about Peru’s acceptance of Ivermectin as a formally approved treatment for COVID-19 patients. The documentary was commissioned to help other parts of the world better understand why Peru and the surrounding region have become an epicenter for a physician movement that has been advocating for the off-label use of Ivermectin. (watch documentary here)
President of Dominican Republic’s Largest Private Health Group Discusses the Success of Ivermectin as a Treatment for Early Stage COVID-19
As TrialSite News reported: “The Rescue Group (Grupo Rescue) is a leading national private health network in the Caribbean nation of Dominican Republic. The Rescue Group operates three hospitals, including Punta Cana Medical Center, Bournigal Medical Center (Puerto Plata), and Canela Clinic (La Romana) as well as affiliated referral hospitals, urgent care facilities, and an in-home service in addition to 17 emergency hotel medical centers. José Natalio Redondo, the group’s president, is renowned in Latin America for the incredible success of his Ivermectin protocol used at the Rescue Group hospitals. Dr. Redondo took the time to speak with TrialSite News about the success of the Ivermectin treatment: they have treated 1,300 early-stage COVID-19 patients and have observed dramatic results. Dr. Redondo reported to TrialSite News the following data based on treating 1,300 COVID-19 patients with Ivermectin:
- 99% of them have been cured
- The average duration of the full infection went from 21 days to 10 days.”
India Begins Wide-scale Distribution
In regions throughout India, where they kicked out the Gates Foundation after his vaccination program killed, paralyzed, sterilized, and seriously injured over 500,000 people (source one and two), they started to give out Ivermectin for free so they don’t have to take another dangerous Gates-funded vaccine.
As Hindustan Times recently reported: “Lucknow admin to set up kiosks for distribution of Ivermectin tablets Lucknow’s district administration will set up around 40 kiosks across the city to ensure free distribution of Ivermectin tablets among asymptomatic Covid-19 patients. A few of these kiosks will become operational from Monday, officials said. Ivermectin, a deworming drug, can be used as a supporting medicine for Covid-19 patients under home isolation and their contacts, according to doctors.
Officials said the kiosks would come up at the airport, city bus stations, railway stations, etc.
Additional district magistrate KP Singh said, ‘The use of the Ivermectin tablet has proved effective for asymptomatic Covid-19 patients. It is also being widely prescribed by government doctors. Hence, the administration, in collaboration with the health department, is setting up kiosks across the city to ensure its free distribution.’ Officials said the project would be implemented in phases. ‘Initially, all the entry and exit points of the city would be covered. It would largely include all four bus stations, railway stations, the airport, and the highway entries and exits,’ an official said. Experts would ensure the distribution of tablets among the people at all these points, he said. The tablets would be given on the basis of the symptoms or if anyone has come in contact with a Covid-19 patient. On Wednesday, chief medical officer (Lucknow) Dr. RP Singh issued a circular, advising people to take Ivermectin tablet, as per their body weight and age, if they test positive and are under home isolation.”
Israeli researcher: Antiparasitic drug could ‘cure’ coronavirus, The Jerusalem Post
Prof. Eli Schwartz, founder of the Center for Travel Medicine and Tropical Disease at Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, recently launched a clinical trial of the drug Ivermectin, a broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent that has also been shown to fight viruses. He believes the drug could help ‘cure’ COVID-19. Schwartz told The Jerusalem Post that the drug is being tested in people with mild to moderate cases of the disease to see if it can shorten the viral shedding period, allowing them to test negative for coronavirus and leave isolation in only a few days. (read full article). No warp speed for Aussie CoVid wonder drug, The Spectator Australia
Why are we ignoring the potential cure under our noses?
Imagine if there was a COVID cure that cut the mortality rate of even the sickest patients by 50 percent, was so safe that it was already being used in aged-care homes to treat nothing more threatening than scabies, and cost next to nothing. Actually, there is. And its efficacy was discovered by a Victorian. The results everywhere have been extremely encouraging, Wagstaff says. Dr. Tarek Alam of the Bangladesh Medical Centre used ivermectin and the antibiotic doxycycline to treat over 400 patients and 98 percent were cured within 4 to 14 days.
In the Dominican Republic, the largest private health network treated 1,300 patients with ivermectin of which 99 percent were cured and the average duration of infection was more than halved from 21 days to 10 days. 33 clinical trials have commenced in Argentina, Egypt, Iraq, Italy, Israel, Mexico, Colombia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Spain, India, Thailand, Brazil, Singapore, the US, but not a single one in Australia. Exacerbating the damage done by the cozy relationship between pharmaceutical companies, major academic medical centers, and regulators, social media giants have become the self-appointed censors of this establishment elite.
CEO Susan Wojcicki says YouTube takes down anything that is ‘medically unsubstantiated’ or goes against the recommendations of the WHO. Twitter and Facebook have followed suit. Videos made by doctors and scientists discussing the research on ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine have been taken down. Even videos on vitamin D — whose major source is sunshine — were censored.” (read full article) Readily Available, Inexpensive Ivermectin Is A Deathblow to Big Pharma Sick Care Racket
Whenever you read an article or hear some so-called “expert” saying that Ivermectin is unsafe, send them this extensive review published in The Journal of Antibiotics:
Ivermectin: enigmatic multifaceted ‘wonder’ drug continues to surprise and exceed expectations.
Over the past decade, the global scientific community has begun to recognize the unmatched value of an extraordinary drug, ivermectin. Today, ivermectin is continuing to surprise and excite scientists, offering more and more promise to help improve global public health by treating a diverse range of diseases, with its unexpected potential as an antibacterial, antiviral and anti-cancer agent being particularly extraordinary. Today, ivermectin remains a relatively unknown drug, although few, if any, other drugs can rival ivermectin for its beneficial impact on human health and welfare.
This unprecedented compound has mainly been used in humans as an oral medication for treating filarial diseases but is also effective against other worm-related infections and diseases, plus several parasite-induced epidermal parasitic skin diseases, as well as insect infestations. For most of this century, some 250 million people have been taking it annually to combat two of the world’s most devastating, disfiguring, debilitating, and stigma-inducing diseases, Onchocerciasis, and Lymphatic filariasis. Ivermectin was a revelation. It had a broad spectrum of activity, was highly efficacious, acting robustly at low doses against a wide variety of nematode, insect, and acarine parasites…. Since the prodigious [ivermectin] drug donation operation began, 1.5 billion treatments have been approved. For long the sole agent used in [Onchocerciasis] control efforts, ivermectin has been so successful that the goal has now switched from disease control to worldwide disease elimination.
In 2015, almost 374 million people required ivermectin for Lymphatic filariasis, with 176.5 million being treated. In 2015, 120.7 million ivermectin treatments were approved for Lymphatic filariasis, an accumulated 1.2 billion treatments being authorized since the drug donation program was extended. Ivermectin mass drug administration also bestows significant secondary community-wide health and socioeconomic benefits due to its impact on non-target infections. During 1995–2010, it was estimated that the disability-adjusted life years averted via the impact on these non-target diseases added a further 500,000 disability-adjusted life years to the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control’s 19.1 million saved due to Onchocerciasis interventions.
Ivermectin is therefore very safe for vertebrates, as it cannot cross the blood-brain barrier. Ivermectin is already deployed to treat a variety of infections and diseases, most of which primarily afflict the world’s poor. But it is the new opportunities with respect to ivermectin usage, or re-purposing it to control a completely new range of diseases, that is generating interest and excitement in the scientific and global health research communities. Ivermectin has now been used for over three decades to treat parasitic infections in mammals, and has an extremely good safety profile, with numerous studies reporting low rates of adverse events when given as an oral treatment for parasitic infections. Several problematic reactions have been recorded, but they are generally mild and usually do not necessitate discontinuation of the drug.
In addition to the gradual appreciation of the diverse and invaluable health and socioeconomic benefits that ivermectin use can provide, research is currently shedding light on the promise that the drug still harbors and the prospects of it combatting a new range of diseases or killing vectors of various disease-causing parasites. The following are an indication of the divergent disease-fighting potential that has been identified for ivermectin thus far: Myiasis, Trichinosis, Disease vector control, Malaria, Leishmaniasis, African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness), American trypanosomiasis (Chagas disease), Schistosomiasis, Bedbugs, Rosacea, Asthma, Epilepsy, Neurological disease, Antiviral (e.g. HIV, dengue, encephalitis), Antibacterial (tuberculosis and Buruli ulcer), Anti-cancer. There is a continuously accumulating body of evidence that ivermectin may have substantial value in the treatment of a variety of cancers. The avermectins are known to possess pronounced antitumor activity, as well as the ability to potentiate the antitumor action of vincristine on Ehrlich carcinoma, melanoma B16, and P388 lymphoid leukemia, including the vincristine-resistant strain P388.
Over the past few years, there have been steadily increasing reports that ivermectin may have varying uses as an anti-cancer agent, as it has been shown to exhibit both anti-cancer and anti-cancer stem cell properties. An in silico chemical genomics approach designed to predict whether any existing drugs might be useful in tackling glioblastoma, lung, and breast cancer, indicated that ivermectin may be a useful compound in this respect. In human ovarian cancer and NF2 tumor cell lines, high-dose ivermectin inactivates protein kinase PAK1 and blocks PAK1-dependent growth. PAK proteins are essential for cytoskeletal reorganization and nuclear signaling, PAK1 being implicated in tumor genesis while inhibiting PAK1 signals induces tumor cell apoptosis (cell death). PAK1 is essential for the growth of more than 70% of all human cancers, including breast, prostate, pancreatic, colon, gastric, lung, cervical, and thyroid cancers, as well as hepatoma, glioma, melanoma, multiple myeloma, and neurofibromatosis tumors. Globally, breast cancer is the most common cancer among women, but treatment options are few. Ivermectin suppresses breast cancer by activating cytostatic autophagy, disrupting cellular signaling in the process, probably by reducing PAK1 expression. Ivermectin-induced cytostatic autophagy also leads to suppression of tumor growth in breast cancer xenografts, causing researchers to believe there is scope for using ivermectin to inhibit breast cancer cell proliferation and that the drug is a potential treatment for breast cancer. Cancer stem cells are a key factor in cancer cells developing resistance to chemotherapies and these results indicate that a combination of chemotherapy agents plus ivermectin could potentially target and kill cancer stem cells, a paramount goal in overcoming cancer. Essentially, a unique, multifaceted ‘wonder’ drug of the past and present may yet become an even more exceptional drug of the future.
United States Government and Media Suppression
Even though the Ivermectin combination includes three proven safe and effective medicines, government agencies are slowing and proactively trying to prevent wide-scale distribution by falsely claiming that it is unproven and unsafe while calling for more studies, and based on past actions they will most likely try to rig those studies, as they did with proven effective Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) treatments because these are inexpensive and readily available medications that large pharmaceutical companies cannot cash in on. To reiterate, Ivermectin-based treatments have already cured hundreds of thousands of COVID-19 patients with minimal, if any, side effects. When compared to the FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) approved COVID-19 drug Gilead Sciences’ Remdesivir, Ivermectin treatments have been clearly proven to be much safer and much more effective, while also being much more readily available for a tiny fraction of the cost. As we know from the proven corrupt COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel approval process, which is dominated by pharmaceutical industry members who voted to shut down life-saving HCQ treatments in favor of the less effective, more dangerous, and highly profitable Remdesivir drug, getting this Ivermectin combination approved through them for wide-scale distribution appears unlikely.
In fact, in response to Ivermectin’s growing momentum, the most recent release from COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel “recommends against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, except in a clinical trial.” Their stated rationale behind this decision is a reiteration of the misleading claims made in articles and “fact” checks that this report has previously referenced: “Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit the replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in cell cultures. However, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies suggest that achieving the plasma concentrations necessary for the antiviral efficacy detected in vitro would require administration of doses up to 100-fold higher than those approved for use in humans. Even though ivermectin appears to accumulate in the lung tissue, predicted systemic plasma and lung tissue concentrations are much lower than 2 µM, the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Ivermectin is not approved for the treatment of any viral infection, including SARS-CoV-2 infection. The FDA issued a warning in April 2020 that ivermectin intended for use in animals should not be used to treat COVID-19 in humans.
Once again, Dr. Borody’s triple therapy treatment allows for a much lower, safe, and effective dose. In addition, thousands of doctors have safely given hundreds of thousands of COVID-19 patients much lower doses with success. The COVID-19 Panel, the FDA, and mainstream media outlets also continually try to mislead people by giving the impression that Ivermectin is only used on animals, which is obviously absurd because billions of people, including millions of children, have safely and effectively take it.
Other than the COVID-19 Panel and the FDA, the usual suspects are once again abdicating their journalistic and ethical responsibilities by repeating Big Pharma misinformation. The World Health Organization, The NY Times, The Guardian, ABC, The Conversation, The National Interest, and “fact” checking websites have already published scandalously misleading information in an attempt to discredit Ivermectin as an effective COVID-19 treatment. Not surprisingly, when you look at the financial disclosures from COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel members, you will see that eight of them are paid by Gilead Sciences, the makers of the panel-approved drug Remdesivir. Several other panel members also have financial ties to large pharmaceutical companies. There are two members paid by Merck, one by INOVIO, one by AstraZeneca, and Eli Lilly, among others. These are blatant conflicts of interest that are clearly leading to the suppression of life-saving inexpensive medicines and resulting in thousands of unnecessary deaths. These people need to be prosecuted for Crimes Against Humanity.
How many more people will have to die unnecessary deaths?
An analysis of the data reveals that suppression of HCQ in the United States has already led to 145,965 unnecessary deaths.
When you compare national death totals between countries that allowed widespread HCQ use to countries that blocked HCQ usage, you find countries that allowed HCQ had a 76.8 percent lower death rate. As of September 4th, the United States has officially reported 190,058 COVID-19 deaths; 76.8 percent of that total equals 145,965 unnecessary deaths.
Here is a brief summary of this analysis:
Early treatment with hydroxychloroquine: a country-based analysis.
We investigate early or prophylactic treatment for COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), which has been adopted or declined in different countries. Since the severity of COVID-19 varies widely based on age and comorbidities, treatment was generally only initiated in higher-risk individuals. The primary endpoint was death. Many countries either adopted or declined early treatment with HCQ, effectively forming a large trial with 1.8 billion people in the treatment group and 663 million in the control group. As of September 3, 2020, an average of 55.2 per million in the treatment group have died, and 461.9 per million in the control group, relative risk 0.120. After adjustments, treatment and control deaths become 114.9 per million and 684.1 per million, relative risk 0.17. The probability of an equal or lower relative risk occurring from random group assignments is 0.008. Accounting for predicted changes in the spread, we estimate a relative risk of 0.23. The treatment group has a 76.8% lower death rate. Confounding factors affect this estimate. We examined diabetes, obesity, hypertension, life expectancy, population density, urbanization, testing level, and intervention level, which do not account for the effect observed. You can read this full analysis and see source data at HCQtrial.com.
To make matters even worse, three studies that were used to discredit and prevent use of HCQ have been exposed as being rigged. The Lancet retracted their fraudulent study because it was based on “fabricated data.” The WHO clinical trials were exposed as giving 3500 COVID-19 patients at 400 hospitals throughout 35 countries “non-therapeutic, toxic and potentially lethal doses of HCQ.” Most disturbing of all, in another clear example of Crimes Against Humanity, a study at Oxford University that was conducted in partnership with the WHO HCQ trials, which was sponsored by the GlaxoSmithKline and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, also gave extremely high doses to 1,542 COVID-19 patients and 396 of them died.
Fortunately, as of right now, the Ivermectin combination includes three medications that are already FDA approved, so it does not need an FDA EUA or COVID Panel approval for current practitioner prescribed use and is readily widely available. Of course, as always, consult your doctor before using it. To reiterate, the censorship, suppression, and false discrediting of HCQ treatments by government agencies and the mainstream media, and the recent suppression of Ivermectin, clearly demonstrates their desire to put pharmaceutical profits before American lives, which unequivocally amounts to Crimes Against Humanity.
The pharmaceutical industry spends twice as much as any other industry lobbying congress. They have captured “regulatory” agencies, including but not limited to the CDC, NIH, NIAID, HHS, FDA, and both the Republican and Democratic parties. In addition, pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and advertising are the largest revenue drivers for mainstream “news” outlets. Beyond mainstream “news” outlets, Alphabet, Google, and YouTube’s parent company, now has two other large subsidiaries, Verily and Calico, which are pharmaceutical companies that have partnered with many of the largest companies in the industry. Therefore, Google and YouTube’s censorship and suppression of inexpensive COVID-19 treatments and any information that is critical of their partner’s expensive medications and the highly profitable “vaccination” program, demonstrates a clear conflict of interest. Other than Google and YouTube’s conflict of interest, social media companies and popular “fact” checking websites are funded by and/or have partnered with foundations that are run by people who will make billions of dollars profiting off expensive COVID-19 medications and the “vaccination” program.
“A vaccine doesn’t cure or prevent occurrence. There are papers that show a vaccine loses its activity between three and six months, so we are in trouble with a vaccine.”~ Dr. Thomas Borody, CDD Medical Director
Exposing the “Official” COVID-19 Narrative
The fear around COVID-19 that the mainstream media and governments have been spreading is significantly exaggerated. As clearly stated above, the virus has been effectively treatable with HCQ combinations, and with the new Ivermectin combination, it can be eradicated.
“In the future, we will not be too worried if you have positivity because you treat it and you won’t have to go to the hospital. It’ll be easier than treating the flu now because you can actually eradicate it. It is surprising, but you can. The virus disappears. It is negative on throat swabs. We have testing which does full sequencing over in Malibu and it disappears there as well. We know it is curable.” ~ Dr. Thomas Borody, CDD Medical Director
The following are all now proven facts, which completely expose the COVID psychological operations that are being spread by corrupt government officials and the mainstream media:
- As thousands of doctors worldwide have proven, in addition to the Ivermectin treatments detailed in this report, there are several other effective COVID-19 treatments. (source one, two, three, four, five)
- The effective treatments have been censored and suppressed for reasons including but not limited to:
a) They are inexpensive, i.e. Big Pharma can’t profit off of them. In fact, antiviral medications such as Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine make “vaccines” unnecessary, which will lead to large pharmaceutical companies losing hundreds of billions of dollars in profit.
b) They completely derail the wider agenda of those interests who are exploiting this virus to implement oppressive economic, “health” and surveillance systems;
c) There is an FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) law that only allows the mass “vaccination” program to continue if there are no other effective treatments. There is also a EUA “National Security” stipulation that requires a significant percentage of the population to be at risk of death, which is another reason why fraudulent false-positive testing is being used, as you will see below. (source)
For all of these reasons, effective treatments have been suppressed; leading to the unnecessary deaths of tens of thousands of people.
- While COVID-19 is a serious threat, the death count has been exaggerated. Underfunded and cash-strapped hospitals have been financially incentivized to record as many COVID-related deaths as possible, resulting in a statistically significant number of falsely reported COVID-related deaths. On top of that, hospitals have also been heavily incentivized to put patients on ventilators, which has also contributed to many additional unnecessary deaths. (source one, two)
As Senator Scott Jensen, who is also a physician, summed it up:
“Hospital administrators might well want to see COVID-19 attached to a discharge summary or a death certificate. Why? Because if it’s straightforward, garden-variety pneumonia that a person is admitted to the hospital for – if they’re Medicare – typically, the diagnosis-related group lump sum payment would be $5,000. But if it’s COVID-19 pneumonia, then it’s $13,000, and if that COVID-19 pneumonia patient ends up on a ventilator, it goes up to $39,000.”
- COVID-19 RT PCR tests are scientifically fraudulent and were not created for diagnostic testing, which has led to an epidemic of false positives. These fraudulent tests are being used as a false metric to continue lockdown policies and spread fear. (source one, two, three)
- Government mandated COVID-19 restrictions and lockdown policies have resulted in an all-out economic disaster that has destroyed the livelihood and financial security of billions of people worldwide, leading to unprecedented rates of hunger, poverty, debt, depression, drug abuse, overdoses and suicides. Meanwhile, the CARES Act and global central banking operations in response to COVID-19 have resulted in an unprecedented consolidation of wealth by the world’s richest 0.01%.
The negative effects and collateral damage from lockdowns worldwide cause significantly more deaths than the virus. Studies conservatively estimate that lockdowns result in the loss of at least seven times more years of life than they will save. Other studies predict they will result in more than 90 times the loss of life than they will save. “Worldwide COVID-19 restrictions are already leading to the deaths of 10,000 children per month and stunting the growth of millions more. As UNICEF Executive Director Henrietta Fore said, ‘It’s been seven months since the first COVID-19 cases were reported, and it is increasingly clear that the repercussions of the pandemic are causing more harm to children than the disease itself.’”
“The disruption of food chains has caused prices to rise, making it difficult for many regions that already had difficulty acquiring food before the pandemic was even more difficult. According to the World Food Program, the number of people in low- and middle-income countries facing acute food insecurity will nearly double to 265 million by the end of 2020. Estimates from the International Food Policy Research Institute suggest that because of the pandemic an additional 140 million people will be thrown into living in extreme poverty in 2020.”
In regard to the increase of deaths by suicide throughout the United States, Dr. Michael de Boisblanc of John Muir Medical Center said, “The numbers are unprecedented,” adding that he’s seen a “years’ worth of suicides” in the last four weeks alone. (source one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten)
- The lockdown, quarantine and closure of schools, religious services, sports, recreational activities, social events, shopping, food and workplaces, along with social distancing measures and mandatory mask use, in combination with 24/7 mainstream media virus fear propaganda, amounts to psychological torture and abuse, which has torn apart and separated many families, and has done significant damage to the psychological wellbeing of billions of people, particularly young children, worldwide. (source one, two)
- A recent study in The Lancet concluded that the lockdowns were not effective in saving lives from the virus, particularly in the United States. Based on data from 50 countries and government health agencies, “Government actions such as border closures, full lockdowns, and a high rate of COVID-19 testing were not associated with statistically significant reductions in the number of critical cases or overall mortality.” (source one, two)
- The Gates Foundation affiliated data models that were used as evidence and justification for the lockdowns to be implemented significantly exaggerated the COVID-19 threat and potential death count based on fraudulent methodology. (source one, two, three, four)
- Bill Gates and large pharmaceutical companies have a huge financial incentive to push vaccines, which have a track record of earning them a $20 to $1 Return on Investment. Meanwhile, their so-called “vaccines” have not been properly tested and have been consistently proven to cause harm to millions of people. (see section below and source two, three)
- Under the guise of philanthropy, over the past decade, Bill Gates, the second richest person in the world, has more than doubled his net worth from $54 billion to $114 billion, largely driven by “vaccine” sales that have killed, paralyzed, sterilized and seriously injured millions of people worldwide. (source one, two, three, four)
- Google, YouTube, popular social media and “fact” checking websites are funded by or predominately influenced by large pharmaceutical companies and their aligned foundations, corrupt NGOs and captured government agencies. (source one, two, three, four, five)
These are just a few of the many critical points that prove this virus was exploited to advance nefariously corrupt agendas. There is no excuse for government officials to not be aware of all of this.
Here is a two-hour crowdsourced video that covers most of the topics listed above:
A History of Pandemic Lies and Vaccine Atrocities
The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in partnership with large pharmaceutical companies have a long-proven track record of exaggerating health threats for profit while sacrificing lives and doing serious harm to millions of people worldwide. Here are just two examples that serve as direct precursors to our current COVID-19 pandemic:
The 1976 H1N1 Swine Flu Scare
a) The CDC warned the nation that the H1N1 Swine Flu could quickly spread across the country and kill millions. The government then compared it to the 1918 influenza pandemic and told everyone that they should take a vaccine to prevent another outbreak. The CDC then ran advertisements falsely saying that many celebrities had taken the shot. After the government and mainstream media spread fear and panic, millions of people ended up taking a Swine Flu vaccine.
b) People taking the shot were told it is was safe. However, the vaccine that was given out, X53A, was never properly tested. In fact, according to doctors who worked on the program, the CDC knew there was a serious risk for neurologic complications. After getting the shot, thousands of people suffered serious injuries, including neurological damage, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, autoimmune disorders, and paralysis, and hundreds of people died.
As it turned out, the Swine Flu threat was significantly exaggerated, and large pharmaceutical companies made windfall profits. Thousands of people then sued the government but received little if any compensation.
Here is a CBS 60 Minutes report on this shocking case of corruption and complete disregard for American lives: (watch video here)
The 2009 H1N1 Swine Flu Scare
- In 2009, 33 years after the first exaggerated H1N1 Swine Flu scare, national governments, the WHO and vaccine producer GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) pulled off the same scam – this time primarily throughout Europe and Africa. Here are report excerpts and a video from Children’s Health Defense (CHD) revealing how they did it in 2009, and how they are now up to their same old tricks again: “It’s Deja-vu with the WHO declaring ‘pandemics’ that result in gold rushes for pharmaceutical companies. But serious adverse events such as the very real narcolepsy epidemic that we saw in the swine flu ‘pandemic’ of 2009 — which many researchers tie to GSK’s Pandemrix vaccine — counter any perceived benefits of these rushed vaccines. CHD’s The Jab video documents the facts behind the unfolding pandemic drama and begs the question: Are we are being played—again?
The winter of 2009 may feel like it was just yesterday, but the Trump administration’s Operation Warp Speed is betting more than two billion dollars that Americans have already forgotten about GlaxoSmithKline’s elaborate scam that caused narcolepsy and cataplexy epidemics across Europe 11 years ago…in the years leading up to 2009, the World Health Organization worked to ensure that dozens of European and African nations executed agreements to protect their citizens in the event of an unforeseen global pandemic. These ‘sleeping contracts’ stipulated that the pharmaceutical companies would be called upon to produce flu vaccines — and be paid billions of dollars for doing so. But there was no reason to fear any financial impropriety because the contracts could only be activated in the event that the WHO declared a phase 6 influenza pandemic. Unfortunately, the government officials who signed the contracts never suspected that GSK makes multimillion-dollar donations to the WHO in return for control over decisions that result in GSK windfalls.
On June 11, 2009, the WHO declared H1N1 swine flu to be a global influenza pandemic, phase 6. Curiously, at that point in time, there were only 144 swine flu deaths in the entire world. Nevertheless, the WHO’s declaration triggered $18 billion in sleeping contracts to activate across the world, and the production of hundreds of millions of H1N1 vaccine doses kicked into high gear — including GlaxoSmithKline’s Pandemrix. GSK’s Pandemrix jab was an experimental vaccine that was never tested for safety or efficacy. It was given straight to hundreds of millions of Africans and Europeans. Before making the declaration, the WHO Director General, Dr. Margaret Chan, sought guidance from an Emergency Committee drawn from a panel of 160 scientists on the WHO’s International Health Regulations Review Committee.
The WHO describes these advisors as ‘the world’s leading experts in their respective fields,’ but their identities are still shrouded in secrecy, which the WHO claimed was necessary to ‘protect them from outside influences.’ But a shocking 2010 British Medical Journal investigation revealed that numerous Emergency Committee members who voted for the pandemic declaration had financial ties to flu vaccine and Tamiflu manufacturers, including GlaxoSmithKline. GSK’s adjuvanted Pandemrix vaccine caused both [Narcolepsy and Cataplexy], devastating at least 1,300 children across Europe – for life. In the media, GSK’s AS03 adjuvant, added to stimulate a powerful immune response, shouldered the blame for amplifying these heinous reactions.
Documents obtained by plaintiffs in a series of European lawsuits revealed that GSK knew about the mounting adverse events associated with Pandemrix in the winter of 2009 – including a 5.4-fold increase in death…. Yet, they continued promoting their vaccine in order to move inventory.
As lawsuits began to pile up, the UK spent millions of pounds defending itself, ultimately settling for nine-figure sums after losing on appeal. After all, every country that signed a sleeping contract was required to grant GSK full legal indemnity for their fast-tracked pandemic vaccine, leaving taxpayers on the hook for defending and settling hundreds of lawsuits.
GSK never stood trial… and they never paid one dollar in fines for influencing the fake pandemic in what Wolfgang Woodard called, ‘One of the greatest medical scandals of the century.’ Relying on the same attenuated definition of ‘pandemic,’ on March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 to be a global pandemic when its partner, the COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator, received 125 million-dollar commitments from the Gates Foundation and Mastercard just one day prior. On July 31, 2020, GSK and Sanofi scored 2.1 billion US taxpayer dollars to partner on an experimental Covid-19 vaccine. Sanofi will provide the vaccine and GSK will provide – you guessed it – hundreds of millions of doses of their AS03 adjuvant from the 2009 narcolepsy epidemic. Will they get away with it this time? (read full report and watch video here)
Exposing the “Vaccine” Sick Care Racket
“We continue to say unequivocally that the vaccines have been studied effectively and that they are safe, and that’s just not true.” ~ Dr. Larry Palevsky
- In the United States, over 50% of children have chronic inflamed conditions;
- 1 in 5 have neuro-developmental disabilities;
- 1 in 10 have ADD / ADHD;
- 1 in 11 have asthma;
- 1 in 20 under the age of 5 have seizures;
- 1 in 35 have autism;
- Autoimmune diseases are exponentially rising.
Leading cause: aluminum nanoparticles in “vaccines.”
Dr. Larry Palevsky, Connecticut Public Health Committee Hearing Testimony on Required Public School Vaccinations: “We know that the biochemical properties of nanoparticles [used in vaccines] are capable of entering the brain…. Animal studies using the same chemicals that are in vaccines that we give to children directly demonstrate that the vaccine ingredients do enter the brain. We are ignoring this information. There are scientists in Europe who have actually done studies on the aluminum nanoparticle and have shown that it can persist in the brain for years and decades. And so, what we are seeing is a large outbreak of neurodevelopmental disabilities in adults, including Alzheimer’s. And one of the main factors that they are finding in the brains of people with Alzheimer’s is the aluminum nanoparticle that’s directly related to the vaccines that we are giving.
We do know that vaccines are supposed to cause inflammation in the body, but we have more than half of our children with chronic inflamed conditions. We’ve never allowed ourselves to ask the question: if the vaccines cause inflammation acutely, do they continue to create inflammation chronically? We have 1 in 5 [children] with neuro-developmental disabilities; 1 in 10 with ADD and ADHD; 1 in 35 with autism; 1 in 11 with asthma and 1 in 20 under the age of 5 with seizures. Autoimmune diseases are exponentially rising, and we are finding that the viruses and the bacteria that we are injecting into the body, along with the adjuvants, create something called ‘molecular mimicry’… so it will turn the immune system on itself leading to an auto-immune condition.
We know this about Hepatitis B. We know it about the Gardasil vaccine, and we know it about the flu vaccine. We continue to say unequivocally that the vaccines have been studied effectively and that they are safe, and that’s just not true.” (watch testimony here)
Vaccine manufactures know this is happening. That’s why they list all of these side effects on their manufacturer’s inserts. They also know that they will make hundreds of billions of dollars annually selling drugs and “treatments” for health conditions that result from their so-called “vaccines.” Please understand, this is NOT about being “anti-vaxx” — which is a propaganda label that these corrupt companies use to falsely smear and discredit actual science and people who reveal their scam – this is about being anti-corruption. This is about being anti-Crimes Against Humanity.
As previously mentioned, the pharmaceutical industry spends twice as much money “lobbying” politicians than any other industry. They dominate both political parties, government “regulatory” agencies, the mainstream media, Google, social media companies, and “fact” checking websites. They also have an army of paid-off “scientists,” “doctors,” universities, physician training programs, state medical board members, and international “health” organization officials. They have captured government agencies, such as the CDC, FDA, HHS, NIH, NIAID, the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel, and the White House COVID Task Force. And now, even though we have proven safe and effective COVID-19 treatments, they want to inject the entire global population with their tainted harmful “vaccines.” This obscenely criminal racket must be broken up, held accountable, and prosecuted. How many more millions of people have to have their lives ruined? As the United States Supreme Court has stated in regard to large pharmaceutical companies, their vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.”
Pandemics and the Rise of Authoritarian Rule
In an insightful article entitled, “Multiple Studies Predicted Governments Become Authoritarian In Response To Pandemics,” journalist Derrick Broze summarizes how viruses create the psychological conditions for the rise of authoritarian rule: “Over the last eight months we have seen many governments around the world enacting authoritarian practices in the name of preventing the spread of COVID-19. In January, the Chinese government began welding people in their homes to stop them from potentially contaminating others. As the panic spread around the world eager politicians now had the excuse, they needed to push policies that restrict freedom of movement and speech.
The authoritarian measures have now grown to include the following:
- checkpoints (asking about travel, checking temperatures)
- temperature screenings at some airports
- contact tracing apps cataloging all your movements and contacts
- emergency orders/executive orders supporting forced vaccinations, isolation, and quarantine
- involuntary quarantine centers/camps
- thermal drones watching people from the sky
- talk of mandatory vaccines (or making it difficult to live without vaccination)
- face recognition tech to fight covid19 (by tracking people violating lockdowns)
- discussion of immunity passports/digital certificates to travel
- censorship of alternative viewpoints
- raiding of businesses for not closing
- arrests of people violating lockdown (and this, and this)
- ankle monitors for those violating quarantine orders
- roving cops searching for people not in the ‘proper’ places
While the rise of authoritarianism as the result of a declared global pandemic may seem an unusual response to such an event, there is actually decades worth of research describing why we are witnessing this growth of tyranny. For example, the study Pathogens and Politics: Further Evidence That Parasite Prevalence Predicts Authoritarianism, provides a deeper understanding of how humans react to perceived threats and how that relates to the type of government the people will accept.
The study focuses on the ‘parasite stress’ hypothesis which proposes that when a species faces parasites and diseases their values are shaped by the experience. In this context, ‘parasite’ is used to refer to any pathogenic organism, including bacteria and viruses. The theory states that depending on how a disease stresses people’s development it can lead to differences in mating preferences and changes in culture. Proponents of the parasite stress theory also note that disease can alter the psychological and social norms of societies. ‘According to a ‘parasite stress’ hypothesis, authoritarian governments are more likely to emerge in regions characterized by a high prevalence of disease-causing pathogens,’ the researchers write. They define authoritarian governance as ‘highly concentrated power structures that repress dissent and emphasize submission to authority, social conformity, and hostility towards outgroups.’ Due to the invisible nature of ‘disease-causing parasites,’ attempts to control the spread of a disease ‘historically depended substantially on adherence to ritualized behavioral practices that reduced infection risk.’
The researchers also found that society tends to promote a collectivist worldview, favoring obedience and conformity from the population, in response to parasites. They examined two different studies, which themselves were analyses of previous works on the parasite stress theory and the implications for authoritarian tendencies in government and individuals. The first study shows that ‘parasite prevalence’ strongly predicted the likelihood for individuals to express authoritarian personalities. The second study focused on ‘small-scale societies’ and found that parasite prevalence ‘predicted measures of authoritarian governance and did so even when statistically controlling for other threats to human welfare.’ The researchers concluded that ‘these results further substantiate the parasite stress hypothesis of authoritarianism, and suggest that societal differences in authoritarian governance result, in part, from cultural differences in individuals’ authoritarian personalities.’ The research also indicates that individuals who dissent from or fail to comply with the aforementioned ‘ritualized behavior’ are seen as a health threat to society. ‘At a psychological level of analysis, empirical evidence reveals that the subjective perception of infection risk causes individuals to be more conformist, to prefer conformity and obedience in others, to respond more negatively toward others who fail to conform, and to endorse more conservative socio-political attitudes,’ the study states. Additionally, a ‘societal level of analysis reveals that in countries and cultures with a historically higher prevalence of diseases, ‘people are less individualistic, exhibit lower levels of dispositional openness to new things, are more likely to conform to the majority opinion.’
These cultures strongly endorse moral values that emphasize group loyalty, obedience, and respect for authority. Simply put, where there is a high prevalence of parasitic diseases the resulting stress on human health is likely to result in the emergence of authoritarian forms of governance. The researchers note that this effect is consistent with previous research which also found ‘pathogen prevalence’ was uniquely linked to conformist attitudes and personality traits. The researchers examined the effects of malnutrition, warfare, and famine, finding that only the threat of famine and pathogens correlate with authoritarian governance. ‘This conclusion is consistent also with psychological evidence showing that, while other threats can also influence individuals’ conformist and ethnocentric attitudes, the perceived threat of infectious disease has effects that are empirically unique,’ the researchers write.
Another study referenced by Pathogens and Politics delves further into the psychology behind perceived threats and conformity. The study, Threat(s) and conformity deconstructed: Perceived threat of infectious disease and its implications for conformist attitudes and behavior, found that the threat of disease ‘may trigger conformist attitudes’ in the population at large. For this study, the researchers used two methodological strategies to examine the effects of disease threat on conformist attitudes and behavior. First, they examined the impact on individuals by focusing on chronic individual differences in Perceived Vulnerability to Disease (PVD). To do this they tested whether individuals who felt more chronically vulnerable to infectious disease also exhibited more strongly conformist attitudes and behavior. ‘Importantly, we also tested whether these predicted correlations remained when statistically controlling for individual differences in concerns pertaining to other (disease-irrelevant) threats,’ they write. What they discovered was that when the threat of infectious disease was prominent the population expressed ‘greater liking for people with conformist traits and exhibited higher levels of behavioral conformity.’ However, there was no comparable increase in conformist attitudes as a result of a temporary threat that was not related to the disease. ‘These results support the hypothesis that the perceived threat of infectious disease exerts an especially potent (and perhaps psychologically unique) influence on individuals’ conformist attitudes and behavior.’
Disturbingly, the study found that an individual’s perception of vulnerability to infection does not necessarily need to be rooted in reality to produce a profound psychological effect. If an individual perceives they are vulnerable to infection they tend to prefer conformity and accept authoritarian measures, even if they are not actually under threat. ‘Our experimental manipulation focused on perception, not reality,’ the researchers note.
When it comes to society as a whole, the researchers found there may also be consequences that impact entire populations. ‘A disease epidemic, or even the perceived threat of an epidemic (such as the H1N1 outbreak of 2009), may lead to temporarily higher levels of conformity within populations and may dispose individuals within those populations to respond more harshly to normative transgressions.’ This field of research clearly indicates the empirical evidence for authoritarian governance and conformist mindsets in response to a perceived threat of infection from a disease. If one takes a step back and examines the results of these studies and the events currently playing out around the world, it’s clear the hypothesis is being proven during the COVID-19 panic.”
The Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex, with its paid-off scientists, doctors, politicians, and mainstream media pundits has proven itself to be a plague upon humanity. They are clearly committing Crimes Against Humanity by deliberately suppressing life-saving medicines in favor of less effective high-priced drugs and an unscientific, not adequately tested, recklessly dangerous, yet astoundingly profitable “vaccination” program.
The fact that Trump and Biden have not repeatedly advocated for these treatments, even though they know they work, emphatically proves that they are still captured by Big Pharma. Health officials such as Fauci, Redfield, Brix, and Hahn obviously know about these inexpensive life-saving medicines. Therefore, all the above are committing Crimes Against Humanity.
They are already responsible for an estimated 145,965 unnecessary American deaths, not to mention what will be an even higher death toll resulting from lockdown policies and the resulting economic hardships and psychological trauma inflicted upon tens of millions of Americans. People are vastly underestimating how corrupt our leaders have become. This is all well beyond ineptitude at this point. Beyond the exaggerated health threats, this virus is being exploited to implement an obscenely oppressive technocratic economic, “health,” and surveillance system. In totality, we are confronted with the evolution of fascism and most people don’t understand what is happening and/or are too afraid to acknowledge it. Television news has become obscenely grotesque propaganda. Between the media and lockdown policies, this is deliberate systematic psychological torture, abuse, and warfare. It is a weaponized behavioral modification run amok. This COVID PSYOP-driven insanity must stop now! Trillions of dollars have been looted from the treasury and American taxpayers via the CARES Act. We have just experienced the largest consolidation of wealth in American history.
While we were and still are struggling through government enacted lockdown policies that have destroyed the livelihoods of tens of millions of people, while over 56 million people have sought unemployment benefits, while over 30 percent of families are behind on mortgage and rent payments, while we are buried in all-time record-breaking debt, while depression and suicide rates skyrocket, while millions of families go hungry, the richest 0.01 percent of the population, who significantly benefited from the bipartisan unanimously-approved CARES Act, have increased their wealth at the fastest rate ever. Think about that, during a pandemic, the richest 0.01 percent experienced the fastest rate of wealth increase in American history.
To break it down for you, the 12 richest Americans have just increased their wealth by 40 percent, adding $283 billion to their already all-time record-breaking net worth.
While we are quarantined in a locked down economy, small and medium-sized businesses are being bankrupted in unprecedented numbers, due to deliberate government policies from “representatives” who went on an extended vacation without doing anything at all to help their constituencies who are suffering from policies that they enacted. When you analyze the overall situation, it is clear that this virus is being exploited to facilitate the implementation of a wickedly oppressive system of control, which a non-terrified, clear-thinking society would never approve of otherwise. Bottom line, we are being systemically enslaved by Global Technocratic Imperial Fascists. Both parties have thrown us overboard.
This coming election is going to be a logistical disaster, which will emphatically prove our corrupted failed state status to those who are still in denial. It will take weeks to declare a winner, and whichever side loses is going to be rightfully upset, which will further increase hostilities, division, and confusion throughout the population. When you mix election chaos with widespread economic desperation, ongoing protests, the nefariously funded and incited looting and rioting already occurring throughout the country, and of course ongoing fear being stoked around the virus, it is clear that we are sitting on a powder keg. All of this will lead to a significant percentage of the population calling for and falling into compliance with increasing authoritarian order.
The next several months may be the most pivotal and dangerous time in our nation’s history.
We are being drowned in divide and conquer propaganda while global technocratic imperialists rob us all blind. The window of opportunity to solve things peacefully is closing fast. To defend our families, we need to focus on forming groups to more effectively disseminate vital information and form communities that are self-sufficient for basic necessities. The extent to which you think I am exaggerating is an accurate measure of how propagandized you are. I say all of this out of love and respect. It is extremely hard to wrap your head around how obscenely corrupt our society has become.
WE ARE UNDER ATTACK.
For you and your family’s sake, I strongly advise the above-mentioned Ivermectin treatment based on your doctor’s approval. Not only will it prevent you from getting COVID-19, but it will also protect you from getting the flu more effectively than a flu shot can, and it will clear up other viruses that you may have. It is inexcusable for this treatment to be suppressed. Above all, PREPARE TO DEFEND YOUR FAMILY.
Please do whatever you can to keep the peace. Think in terms of measured strategic defense.
All in all, the “official” lies are unraveling and we are gaining solid traction in uniting people with opinions across the political spectrum. We have been getting support from an incredibly diverse group of people who rarely ever agree on things. As shockingly corrupt and crazy as things have become, we may be at a tipping point where people with diverse perspectives come together against the core of systemic corruption.
Due to the virus having such a personal impact on everyone, and because the systemically power-crazed forces are exploiting it to such an extreme degree, this could be the point in which real changes take root. Obviously, it won’t be easy, but there is HOPE. If this “COVID CURE” is not widely distributed as efficiently as possible, we now have clear evidence of Crimes Against Humanity, which will open up eyes and activate anyone who is willing to use their critical thinking skills.
TAKE ACTION NOW
- GO TO YOUR DOCTOR TO GET A PREVENTATIVE TREATMENT OF IVERMECTIN FOR YOUR FAMILY.
- FLOOD YOUR NEAREST MEDIA STUDIOS, GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES AND SOCIAL MEDIA WITH THIS LIFE-SAVING INFORMATION.
- FORM LOCAL COMMUNITIES THAT ARE 100% SELF-SUFFICIENT FOR BASIC NECESSITIES. WE CANNOT RELY ON EITHER CORRUPTED PARTY OR LARGE CENTRALIZED SYSTEMS ANYMORE.
7 comments on “Proven Effective Triple Therapy: Ivermectin, Zinc and Doxycycline”
The links to torrent do not have the PDFs you mention.
Is there another location from which we can download?
Sources of Ivermectin Tablets
Additional Sites for Prevention and Treatment with Ivermectin
Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance Prevention & Treatment Protocols for COVID-19: https://www.thecompleteguidetohealth.com/ivermectinprotocols.htm
How to get Ivermectin – https://covid19criticalcare.com/guide-for-this-website/how-to-get-ivermectin/
Thank you so much!
The second link brings me to atorrents again.
Did you mean to do that?
I am not sure what is going on with that link. Sorry. Just go with the critical care link.