Is President Trump’s “Deal of the Century” a pathway for “The Greater Israel Project”?
“By way of deception” – the motto of Mossad, Israel’s intelligence service.
Israel has been the world’s number one sponsor of terrorism.
1954 Lavon Affair
1967 Israel attacked the USS Liberty
1986 Trojan the deception that led Reagan to bomb Libya 2001
The mother all deceptions (9-11-2001)
General Wesley’s Clarks remarks concerning “seven countries in five years”
These wars have produced the refugee crisis raging Western countries today. The goal of the Greater Israel Project is to wipe out the “white” European race and make everyone that is not Jewish slaves to the Jews.
The hot potato of mass immigration is not a natural phenomenon, the causes of which are cleverly concealed by the system and the ridiculous multicultural propaganda is trying to falsely portray it as inevitable. This is not a spontaneous phenomenon at all.
What they want to present as an inevitable outcome of modern life, is actually a Talmudic Luciferian plan conceived around a table and prepared for decades, to completely destroy the face of the european continent. The push for multiculturalism or diversity in western societies is nothing less than white genocide at work. Anyone asking critical questions or pointing out to this factual reality is labeled a racist or anti-Semite.
Why is the Coudenhove Kalergi plan which has a goal of total destruction of Western societies being ignored in the mainstream media?
Four of the largest five entertainment giants are now run or owned by Jews.
Murdoch’s News Corp (at number four) is the only gentile holdout — however Rupert is as pro-Israel as any Jew, probably more so.” (Los Angeles Jewish Times (2) Oct. 29. 1999) [other sources claim Murdoch’s mother, Elisabeth J. Greene, is Jewish]
Such as it is, the press has become the greatest power within the Western World, more powerful than the legislature, the executive and judiciary. One would like to ask; by whom has it been elected and to whom is it responsible” —Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
The Kalergi Plan to eliminate “white” Europeans (White Genocide)
The essence of the Kalergi plan
In his book «Praktischer Idealismus», Kalergi indicates that the residents of the future “United States of Europe” will not be the native People of the Old Continent, but a kind of sub-humans, products of miscegenation.
He clearly states that the peoples of Europe should interbreed with Asians and colored races, thus creating a multinational flock with no quality and easily controlled by the ruling elite.
Let’s take a look who has received awards for their participation in exterminating “white” people?
EU leaders continue to receive the Coudenhove-Kalergi European prize, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi which was inspired by Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi’s theories.
I have, however, been made aware that one of his publications, ‘Practical Idealism’, contains racist theories and rhetoric and espouses racial engineering. This bears an uncanny parallel with the ‘open door’ immigration attitude to North African and African countries that we have seen throughout the EU Member States.
South Africa is openly killing white farmers.
South Africa has long had a serious problem with crime. The murder rate is 36 per 100,000, meaning 57 people are murdered each day, placing South Africa’s homicide rate just behind that of countries now at war. Of the ten worst precincts for murder, seven are in the province of Western Cape. Nyanga has the highest murder rate in South Africa, helping make Cape Town the second most murderous city in the world and the crime capital of South Africa. The situation there is so bad that the South African National Defense Force (SANDF) has deployed troops to assist the South African Police Service (SAPS) in the Cape Flats area, a gang-dominated suburb of Cape Town.
Would the Commission assure my constituents that current EU immigration policies do not reflect and are not part of the ‘Kalergi plan’? They can’t because they are actually receiving awards for their participation.
The award is called “The Charlemagne Prize” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlemagne_Prize
Here are the recipients of the eugenics prize. https://www.geni.com/projects/Recipients-of-the-Charlemagne-Prize/12120
- 1950 : Richard Nikolaus, Graf von Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894-1972)
- 1951 : Hendrik Brugmans
- 1952 : Alcide de Gasperi
- 1953 : Jean Monnet
- 1954 : Konrad Adenauer (1876-1967)
- 1956 : Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
- 1957 : Paul Henri Spaak (1899-1972)
- 1958 : Robert Schuman (1886-1963)
- 1959 : George C. Marshall (1880-1959)
- 1960 : Joseph Bech
- 1961 : Walter Hallstein
- 1963 : Edward Heath (1916-2005)
- 1964 : Antonio Segni
- 1966 : Jens Otto Krag
- 1967 : Joseph Luns
- 1969 : The European Commission
- 1970 : François Seydoux de Clausonne
- 1972 : Roy Jenkins
- 1973 : Salvador de Madariaga y Rojo (1886-1978)
- 1976 : Leo Tindemans
- 1977 : Walter Scheel
- 1978 : Konstantinos Karamanlis
- 1979 : Emilio Colombo
- 1981 : Simone Veil
- 1982 : Juan Carlos I, rey de España (1938- )
- 1984 : Karl Carstens
- 1986 : The People of Luxembourg
- 1987 : Henry Kissinger
- 1988 : François Mitterrand (1916-1996) and Helmut Kohl (1930- )
- 1989 : Frère Roger (of the Taizé Community)
- 1990 : Gyula Horn
- 1991 : Václav Havel
- 1992 : Jacques Delors
- 1993 : Felipe González
- 1994 : Gro Harlem Brundtland
- 1995 : Franz Vranitzky
- 1996 : Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands
- 1997 : Roman Herzog
- 1998 : Bronislaw Geremek 40. 1999 : Tony Blair (1953- )
- 2000 : Bill Clinton (1946- )
- 2001 : György Konrád
- 2002 : The Euro
- 2003 : Valéry Giscard d’Estaing (1926- )
- 2004 : Pat Cox
- 2004 : Pope John Paul II (extraordinary prize) (1920-2005)
- 2005 : Carlo Azeglio Ciampi
- 2006 : Jean-Claude Juncker
- 2007 : Javier Solana (1942- )
- 2008 : Angela Merkel (1954- )
- 2009 : Andrea Riccardi
- 2010 : Donald Tusk (1957-)
- 2011 : Jean-Claude Trichet
- 2012 : Wolfgang Schäuble
- 2013 : Dalia Grybauskaitė (1956- )
- 2014 : Herman Van Rompuy (1947-)
- 2015 : Martin Schultz
- 2016 : Pope Francis (1936-)
And for the most recent three recipients https://www.karlspreis.de/en/laureates
- Timothy Garton Ash 2017
- Emmanuel Macron 2018
- António Guterres 2019
Those protecting this genocide plan will say that the Greater Israel Project is not real, but I just ask you to look at what is actually happening today, and it becomes obvious this plan is in play.
The goal is the “Greater Israel Project”
According to Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya in a 2011 Global Research article, The Yinon Plan was a continuation of Britain’s colonial design in the Middle East:
“[The Yinon plan] is an Israeli strategic plan to ensure Israeli regional superiority. It insists and stipulates that Israel must reconfigure its geo-political environment through the balkanization of the surrounding Arab states into smaller and weaker states.
Israeli strategists viewed Iraq as their biggest strategic challenge from an Arab state. This is why Iraq was outlined as the centerpiece to the balkanization of the Middle East and the Arab World. In Iraq, on the basis of the concepts of the Yinon Plan, Israeli strategists have called for the division of Iraq into a Kurdish state and two Arab states, one for Shiite Muslims and the other for Sunni Muslims. The first step towards establishing this was a war between Iraq and Iran, which the Yinon Plan discusses.
The Atlantic, in 2008, and the U.S. military’s Armed Forces Journal, in 2006, both published widely circulated maps that closely followed the outline of the Yinon Plan. Aside from a divided Iraq, which the Biden Plan also calls for, the Yinon Plan calls for a divided Lebanon, Egypt, and Syria. The partitioning of Iran, Turkey, Somalia, and Pakistan also all fall into line with these views. The Yinon Plan also calls for dissolution in North Africa and forecasts it as starting from Egypt and then spilling over into Sudan, Libya, and the rest of the region.
“Greater Israel” requires the breaking up of the existing Arab states into small states.
The plan operates on two essential premises. To survive, Israel must . . .
1) Become an imperial regional power
2) It must affect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states.
It will depend on the ethnic or sectarian composition of each state. Consequently, the Zionist hope is that sectarian-based states become Israel’s satellites and, ironically, its source of moral legitimation…
This is not a new idea, nor does it surface for the first time in Zionist strategic thinking. Indeed, fragmenting all Arab states into smaller units has been a recurrent theme.” (Yinon Plan, see below)
Viewed in this context, the war on Syria and Iraq is part of the process of Israeli territorial expansion.
Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, September 06, 2015, updated June 22, 2017
President Donald Trump has confirmed in no uncertain terms, his support of Israel’s illegal settlements (including his opposition to UN Security Council Resolution 2334, pertaining to the illegality of the Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank).
In recent developments, the Trump administration has expressed its recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights.
“Greater Israel” will be part of the forthcoming March 2020 election campaign. Netanyahu has pledged to annex large parts of the occupied West Bank.
Do voters want to make permanent their country’s control over the West Bank and its 2.6 million Palestinian inhabitants? Or do they want to keep alive the possibility that a Palestinian state could be carved out there one day?
That question has been made newly urgent by Mr. Netanyahu, who is facing a career-threatening challenge from a unified centrist party headed by a team of former army chiefs. His shocking announcement about Israeli sovereignty in the West Bank appeared to be a last-ditch effort to rally his right-wing base and stay in power.
For supporters of annexation, it is not only this week’s vote that is on their minds but the American election in 2020: They call President Trump’s staunch support for Israel a “historic opportunity” to proceed with annexation of some, much or even all of the West Bank — but one that comes with a ticking countdown to a possible new administration in Washington.
“Today [September before second 2019 elections] I announce my intention, with the formation of the next government, to establish Israeli sovereignty on the Jordan Valley and the northern Dead Sea.” (emphasis added)
Despite his indictments on grounds of corruption, Netanyahu’s leadership win will contribute to consolidating anti-Arab sentiment within the Likud party.
Trump’s “Deal of the Century” is supportive of the “Greater Israel” project, which also consists in the derogation of Palestinians’ “right of return” by “naturalizing them as citizens of Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, Iraq, and elsewhere regionally where they reside”.
According to Haaretz, Trump’s scheme aims to eliminate Palestinian refugees by naturalizing them as citizens of Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, Iraq, and elsewhere regionally where they reside.
It’s all about rendering UN General Assembly Resolution 194 null and void — resolving that “refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbors should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible.”
The right of return to one’s country of origin or citizenship is inviolable international law. The fundamental right is affirmed by Fourth Geneva, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Bear in mind: The Greater Israel design is not strictly a Zionist Project for the Middle East, it is an integral part of US foreign policy which translates to a (CIA, MI6, and Mossad) policy, its strategic objective is to fracture and balkanize the Middle East.
Israeli newspaper reveals leaked document of Trump’s ‘deal of the century’
According to the document, if Hamas and Islamic Jihad refused to sign the deal, a war would be launched against them supported by the US
“We are ready to commit to the defense of Israel anytime we get involved in a kinetic fight there is always the risk that there will be casualties. But we accept that – as every conflict, we train for and enter, there is always that possibility,” Clark said, highlighting that U.S. soldiers should be prepared to die for the Jewish state.
Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital is intended to trigger political instability throughout the region.
When viewed in the current context, including the siege on Gaza, the Zionist Plan for the Middle East bears an intimate relationship to the 2003 invasion of Iraq based on lies, the 2006 war on Lebanon, the 2011 war on Libya, the ongoing wars on Syria, Iraq and Yemen, not to mention the political crisis in Saudi Arabia.
The “Greater Israel” project consists in weakening and eventually fracturing neighboring Arab states as part of a US-Israeli expansionist project, with the support of NATO and Saudi Arabia.
In this regard, the Saudi Israeli rapprochement is from Netanyahu’s viewpoint a means to expanding Israel’s spheres of influence in the Middle East as well as confronting Iran. Needless today, the “Greater Israel” project is consistent with America’s imperial design.
“Greater Israel” consists in an area extending from the Nile Valley to the Euphrates. According to Stephen Lendman,
“A near-century ago, the World Zionist Organization’s plan for a Jewish state included”
• Historic Palestine
• South Lebanon up to Sidon and the Litani River
• Syria’s Golan Heights, Hauran Plain and Deraa
• Control of the Hijaz Railway from Deraa to Amman, Jordan as well as the Gulf of Aqaba.
Some Zionists wanted more – land from the Nile in the West to the Euphrates in the East, comprising Palestine, Lebanon, Western Syria and Southern Turkey.”
To learn more about the Israel Project click here:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/greater-israel-and-the-balkanization-of-the-middle-east-oded- yinons-strategy-for- israel/5649059?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articl es
The point is all the wars in the middle east were pre-planned and have no benefit at all to Americans.
Israel has nukes and will not sign peace treaty.
Over the past four decades all U.S. presidents and Israeli prime ministers have stood by an agreement concerning Israel’s worst kept secret: its undeclared nuclear arsenal. According to the agreement, the U.S. will not press Israel to give up its nuclear weapons so long as it keeps facing existential threats in the Middle East.
In 1969, Prime Minister Golda Meir met with U.S. President Richard Nixon and they reached an unwritten agreement that Israel would not declare or test its nuclear weapons. The unwritten deal would be renewed by the following U.S. administrations, until Bill Clinton. Netanyahu would not settle for an unwritten deal and during the Clinton administration in 1998, the first secret letter was drafted.
Israel’s nuclear facility, located in the Negev desert in southern Israel, was built with French assistance at the end of the 1950s and first began operating at the end of 1963. Israel had concealed the Dimona nuclear reactor from the U.S. until the reactor was an established fact. Between 1957 and 1960, Israel’s effort to hide the project had been crowned a success.
Israel crossed the nuclear threshold on the eve of the Six-Day War, in 1967. At that time, it had three nuclear devices, according to Avner Cohen, a nuclear historian at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey and the author of two books on the origins of Israel’s nuclear program.
Israeli efforts to build a bomb at the nuclear complex in Dimona had been a source of tension with Washington for nearly a decade. But, by the fall of 1969, when Golda Meir, Israel’s Prime Minister, met with Richard Nixon at the White House, Israel’s possession of nuclear weapons was a fait accompli and the two sides reached an unwritten understanding: the Israelis would not declare, test, or threaten to use their nuclear weapons, and the Americans would not pressure the Israelis to sign a landmark international nuclear-nonproliferation treaty known as the N.P.T.
(Israel never became a signatory, and U.S. efforts to inspect Dimona stopped.)
Israel’s Quest for Yellowcake: The Secret Argentine Israeli Connection, 1963-1966 William Burr, National Security Archive, and Avner Cohen, James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, editors Washington, D.C., June 25, 2013 https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb432/
During 1963-64, the Israeli government secretly acquired 80-100 tons of Argentine uranium oxide (“yellowcake”) for its nuclear weapons program, according to U.S. and British archival documents published today for the first time jointly by the National Security Archive, the Nuclear Proliferation International History Project, and the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey institute of International Studies (MIIS).
The U.S. government learned about the facts of the sale through Canadian intelligence and found out even more from its Embassy in Argentina. In response to U.S. diplomatic queries about the sale, the government of Israel was evasive in its replies and gave no answers to the U.S.’s questions about the transaction.
These nearly unknown documents shed light on one of the most obscure aspects of Israel’s nuclear history-how secretly and vigorously Israel sought raw materials for its nuclear program and how persistently it tried to cultivate relations with certain nuclear suppliers. Yellowcake, a processed uranium ore, was critically important to Israel for fueling its nuclear reactor at Dimona and thereby for producing plutonium for weapons.
The story of the Argentine yellowcake sale to Israel has remained largely unknown in part because Israel has gone to great lengths to keep tight secrecy to this day about how and where it acquired raw materials for its nuclear program.
That Argentina made the yellowcake sale to Israel has already been disclosed in declassified U.S. intelligence estimates, but how and when Washington learned about the sale and how it reacted to it can now be learned from largely untapped archival sources. Among the disclosures in today’s publication:
• French restrictions on Israel’s supply of uranium in 1963 made U.S. and British officials suspect that Israel would attempt to acquire yellowcake from other sources without any tangible restrictions to sustain its nuclear weapons program
• A Canadian intelligence report from March 1964 asserted Israel had all of the “prerequisites for commencing a modest nuclear weapons development project.”
• When the Canadians discovered the Argentine-Israeli deal they were initially reluctant to share the intelligence with Washington because the United States had refused to provide them with information on a recent U.S. inspection visit by U.S. scientists to Dimona.
• U.S. and British intelligence were skeptical of the Canadian finding until September 1964 when U.S. Embassy sources in Argentina confirmed the sale to Israel.
• The Israelis evaded answering questions about the transaction. When U.S. scientists visited the Dimona facility in March 1966 as part of the August 1963 secret agreement between President Kennedy and Prime Minister Eshkol, they asked about the yellow cake, but their Israeli hosts said that question was for “higher officials.”
• In 1964 U.S. officials tried to persuade the Argentines to apply strong safeguards to future uranium exports but had little traction for securing agreement.
• In 1965, while the CIA and the State Department were investigating the Argentine yellowcake sale, Washington pursued rumors that the French uranium mining company in Gabon had sought permission to sell yellowcake to Israel.
Washington found that the sale was irreversible and that it could learn nothing about its purpose, although it kept trying. The Argentines said they could only apply strong safeguards to future sales while the Israelis evaded all queries about the yellowcake, although as part of a high-level deal between President Kennedy and Prime Minister Eshkol from 1963 Israel had allowed U.S. government experts to visit their nuclear reactor at Dimona.
The U.S. team apparently raised the Argentine yellowcake during a 1966 visit, but the Israelis were not helpful in providing explanations. The CIA could not learn anything concrete about the transaction either.
As the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada had routinely acted with the utmost discretion when sharing intelligence information about the Israeli nuclear program, they kept the entire yellowcake sale secret. On this matter there were no leaks; the issue never reached the U.S. media then or later.
Ali Abunimah mentioned that there was an organization back in the 1960s called the American Zionist Council which was, in fact, ordered to register as an Israeli foreign agent because it received funding from Israel to start up and conduct public relations.
But that same organization—along with pressure on the Justice Department—managed to supplant the U.S. Foreign Agents Registration Act and their desire to have open information on the money coming in and the policies being enacted, and silenced the Justice Department through pure internal pressure into not even releasing the registration that was finally compelled in 1962. The Justice Department held on to it until 2010.
But there’s a clear set of documents that shows that AIPAC was originally ordered, when it was operating as an unincorporated organization inside the AZC, to comply with the FARA order and it never did. The Justice Department never did anything about it, and they won’t even talk about it. So that exploitation is that foreign agent activities immediately resumed for the Israeli government when AIPAC incorporated itself in 1963, just six weeks after that order. AZC’s gone, AIPAC’s been with us ever since.
This has happened in weapons smuggling. Telogy is a recent example of Tektronix oscilloscopes being shipped to Israel for their nuclear weapons program. They were able to simply get a slap on the wrist for an export violation. But it’s been going on since the very first Neutrality Act violations in the 1940s, where there was a major Israeli weapon smuggling ring in the United State.
Some people called it the Haganah smuggling ring, others call it other things, but it was able to move a large number of conventional weapons out of this country to Israel with almost no criminal prosecutions.
Israel’s First US Espionage and Smuggling Network
Newly declassified Navy intelligence reports foreshadowed future
by Grant Smith Posted on May 30, 201
Newly declassified postwar Naval Intelligence files shine new light on a little-known chapter of U.S.-Israel relations. Massive supplies of American WWII military surplus under liquidation by the War Assets Administration were an irresistible target for Israel’s government-in-waiting the Jewish Agency and nascent military the Haganah in the years immediately preceding Israel’s declaration of statehood in 1948.
The Jewish Agency was an organization contemplated as a vital actor for achieving that statehood in Theodore Herzl’s original Zionist vision. Explosives, advanced fighter, bomber and transport aircraft, and Jewish veterans culled from a list stolen from the U.S. Chaplain all entered a Jewish Agency pipeline stretching from the US to Mexico, Panama, Italy and Czechoslovakia to Palestine.
The stories these newly declassified files tell not only foreshadow the institutionalized immunity of crimes committed in the name of Israel, but major challenges the US would later have to confront beyond displaced Palestinian refugees and simmering conflict – ongoing money laundering into US politics and Israel’s early desire to build nuclear weapons. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-haganah
Israel is allowed to have Nuclear weapons and does not have to sign any nonproliferation treaty and is still receiving billions of dollars in aid even though over 50% of Americans do not approve.
A poll we conducted in August of 2018 asked Americans whether—given the fact that Arms Export Control Act laws that govern foreign aid to countries with nuclear weapons programs that haven’t signed the NPT, and the fact that Israel has not signed the NPT—should those laws be enforced, 54.8 percent said yes
The thread continues . . . https://twitter.com/AIPAC/status/1207767477863759872?s=20
Congress also extended for two years the Defense Department’s authority to stockpile weapons in Israel. It also supported use of the Strategic Defense Acquisition Fund “to transfer precision guided munitions and related defense articles and services to reserve stocks f… https://twitter.com/AIPAC/status/1207767479549857793?s=20
In addition, the legislation provides funding for the U.S.-Israel Center of Excellence in Energy and Water. The bill also deepens U.S.-Israel cooperation through continued support for ongoing cooperation in the areas of homeland security, cyber, agriculture and energy. https://twitter.com/AIPAC/status/1207767480904630277?s=20
Congress also included provisions challenging anti-Israel bias at the UN. The legislation permits @POTUS to withhold five percent of U.S. funding to any UN specialized agency that acts against the national security interest of the U.S. or an ally of the U.S., including Isr…
Thank you, Senators @senatemajldr @SenSchumer @SenShelby @LindseyGrahamSC @SenatorLeahy @SenatorDurbin @SenatorCollins @SenCapito @SenatorLankford Twitter
Thank you, Representatives @SpeakerPelosi @LeaderHoyer @GOPLeader @SteveScalise @NitaLowey @RepKayGranger @RepHalRogers @RepVisclosky @KenCalvert @BradSherman @RepChuck @RepRoybalAllard
Only orthodox Jews are allowed to open carry rifles in New York. https://bigleaguepolitics.com/orthodox-jews-open-carry-ar-rifles-after-anti-semitic-attacks/
The ADL is not being made to register as a foreign lobbying agent and they are behind demonizing all “white” people except for Jewish people. https://www.adl.org/education/resources/glossary-terms/defining-extremism-white-supremacy
The ADL lobbied Congress relentlessly to pass a bill banning “white Nationalism. No kidding. It passed in the House on January 15, 2019.
The ADL lobbied for Congress to create an Anti-Semitic bill that would make it unlawful to question a Jewish person and guess what?
President Trump started that process by passing an Executive Order that is a total violation of America’s first amendment “Free Speech”
The last time an anti-semitism bill was passed, The Holodomor took place and over 60 million Christians were killed by Bolshevik Jews in Ukraine. https://www.ihr.org/jhr/v14/v14n1p-4_Weber.html
Christians are the most persecuted people in the entire world and yet they are given NO PROTECTIONS. NOTHING! WHY?
Faced with these realities in addition to the fact that our politicians and prominent business men have been blackmailed by Mossad,CIA, and MI6. https://www.mintpressnews.com/mega-group-maxwells- mossad-spy-story-jeffrey-epstein-scandal/261172/
What is going to happen to America?